crawl
Retrieve page content from a website by crawling. Define start URL, depth, and page limit.
Instructions
Crawl a website for page content
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Start URL | |
| limit | No | Max pages | |
| maxDepth | No | Max depth |
Retrieve page content from a website by crawling. Define start URL, depth, and page limit.
Crawl a website for page content
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Start URL | |
| limit | No | Max pages | |
| maxDepth | No | Max depth |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description does not disclose behavioral traits such as rate limits, robots.txt adherence, page count limits, or depth behavior. Essentially opaque aside from basic function.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise single sentence, but lacks any structure like bullet points or front-loading of key information. Could be improved without increasing length significantly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Description does not explain return format or content structure, nor does it clarify boundary behaviors (e.g., what happens when maxDepth or limit is omitted). Incomplete for a tool with no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers all parameters with brief descriptions (url: 'Start URL', maxDepth: 'Max depth', limit: 'Max pages'). Description adds no additional meaning beyond schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Crawl', resource 'a website', and outcome 'page content'. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like 'scrape' and 'search' which imply different actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use crawl vs alternatives like scrape or search. Missing context about appropriate use cases or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/schlemperdev/shantycrawl-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server