Skip to main content
Glama

get_project

Retrieve project details from the MCP-APIKit server by providing a project ID to access API information and manage integrations.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesProject ID

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function that executes the 'get_project' MCP tool logic: fetches the project by ID using eolinkService and returns it as JSON text content.
    async ({ projectId }) => {
      const project = await eolinkService.getProject(projectId);
      return {
        content: [{ 
          type: "text", 
          text: JSON.stringify({ project }, null, 2) 
        }]
      };
    }
  • Input schema definition for the 'get_project' tool using Zod.
    { projectId: z.string().describe("Project ID") },
  • Registration of the 'get_project' tool on the MCP server instance using the SDK's tool() method.
    this.server.tool(
      "get_project",
      { projectId: z.string().describe("Project ID") },
      async ({ projectId }) => {
        const project = await eolinkService.getProject(projectId);
        return {
          content: [{ 
            type: "text", 
            text: JSON.stringify({ project }, null, 2) 
          }]
        };
      }
    );
  • Helper method in eolinkService that performs the actual HTTP GET request to retrieve a project by ID from the Eolink API.
    async getProject(projectId: string): Promise<Project | null> {
      try {
        const response = await axios.get(`${this.baseUrl}/projects/${projectId}`, {
          headers: this.getHeaders(),
        });
        return response.data.data || null;
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(`Error fetching project ${projectId}:`, error);
        return null;
      }
    }
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/scarqin/mcp-apikit'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server