Skip to main content
Glama
scamverifyai

ScamVerify

by scamverifyai

Related Servers

Alternatives to ScamVerify

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables phone number intelligence and spam-risk detection by combining metadata, FTC complaint history, and IPQS reputation into explainable risk scores with confidence levels.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides real-time threat intelligence for AI agents, enabling checks on IPs, domains, URLs, hashes, CVEs, prompt-injection payloads, and malicious AI-skill/MCP-tool definitions against a free database of 890K+ IOCs.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      URL intelligence for AI agents. One URL in, structured security and data quality signals out across 7 dimensions. 13 tools, risk score 0-100 with 23 configurable weights.
      16
      33 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scans suspicious messages, URLs, and text for scams inside any MCP-compatible AI assistant. No signup or API key needed for anonymous use.
      1
      45 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security intelligence for AI agents — breach detection, SIM swap, domain lookalikes, OAuth watchlist, and malware scanning. Subscription or x402 PAYG.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose based on input type (phone, URL, email, text, document, QR) and operation mode (single vs. batch). The 'check_' prefix clearly identifies analysis tools, while 'batch_' and 'get_' group utility functions, leaving no ambiguity about which tool to invoke for a given scam verification task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 10 tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun convention (check_phone, batch_url, get_status). The verb choices are semantically coherent: 'check' for analysis operations, 'batch' for bulk processing, and 'get' for administrative retrieval, creating a predictable naming scheme throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, the server hits the sweet spot for a scam verification API. The set includes single-item checks for six input types, batch variants for high-volume channels (phone/URL), and essential administrative tools (status/usage), with no redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers all major scam vectors (voice, web, email, SMS, physical documents, QR codes) with appropriate AI and database verification. Minor gap: batch operations are only available for phone and URL lookups, not for email, text, or document analysis, though this may reflect typical usage patterns.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive