Skip to main content
Glama
scamverifyai

ScamVerify

by scamverifyai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ScamVerify

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Numvo

      karthik1029
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables phone number intelligence and spam-risk detection by combining metadata, FTC complaint history, and IPQS reputation into explainable risk scores with confidence levels.
      1
      -

    • trust-score

      Br0ski777
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.
      MIT

    • rugradar

      Darkjay123
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check whether a crypto token, link, or forwarded "gem" message is a scam by running contract rules, live test trades, creator history, and market data across 64 networks, returning plain-English or Pidgin verdicts. Also supports scanning messages, reviewing a token's past checks, and explaining individual findings.
      5
      MIT

    • Nullcone MCP Server

      maco144
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides real-time threat intelligence for AI agents, enabling checks on IPs, domains, URLs, hashes, CVEs, prompt-injection payloads, and malicious AI-skill/MCP-tool definitions against a free database of 890K+ IOCs.
      -

    • unphurl-mcp

      123Ergo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      URL intelligence for AI agents. One URL in, structured security and data quality signals out across 7 dimensions. 13 tools, risk score 0-100 with 23 configurable weights.
      16
      56 npm
      1
      MIT

    • @ismalicious/mcp-server

      hexablob
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents threat-intelligence verdicts for IPs, domains, URLs and hashes, CVE lookups with EPSS and CISA KEV data, and a prompt-injection gate that scans untrusted text before the agent acts on it. Agents can also batch-check up to 100 indicators, hunt brand-lookalike domains, and track scan and request quotas.
      1
      89 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose based on input type (phone, URL, email, text, document, QR) and operation mode (single vs. batch). The 'check_' prefix clearly identifies analysis tools, while 'batch_' and 'get_' group utility functions, leaving no ambiguity about which tool to invoke for a given scam verification task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 10 tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun convention (check_phone, batch_url, get_status). The verb choices are semantically coherent: 'check' for analysis operations, 'batch' for bulk processing, and 'get' for administrative retrieval, creating a predictable naming scheme throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, the server hits the sweet spot for a scam verification API. The set includes single-item checks for six input types, batch variants for high-volume channels (phone/URL), and essential administrative tools (status/usage), with no redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers all major scam vectors (voice, web, email, SMS, physical documents, QR codes) with appropriate AI and database verification. Minor gap: batch operations are only available for phone and URL lookups, not for email, text, or document analysis, though this may reflect typical usage patterns.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources