remove_initiate_login_uri

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Remove (clear)', which implies mutation, but does not state idempotency, side effects on related settings, permissions required, or behavior when the URI is not set. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It conveys the action and the required parameter format efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter removal tool with no output schema, the description covers the essential action and parameter. However, the absence of any behavioral context (e.g., idempotency, errors, or effect on other settings) and no annotations means it is only minimally complete. Given the tool's simplicity, it is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides a pattern (^env_\w+$) but no description. The tool description adds the explicit format hint 'env_<number>', which is more restrictive than the schema and gives the agent actionable guidance. Since this is the only parameter and schema coverage is 0%, the description compensates adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Remove') and resource ('initiate login URI'), making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like set_initiate_login_uri and remove_redirect_uri by naming the exact URI type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as remove_redirect_uri or set_initiate_login_uri. The description only mentions the required environmentId format, which is more of a parameter constraint than usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.