Skip to main content
Glama
sbanthia92

Second Read

by sbanthia92
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Second Read

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ScholarScout

      amnanazir101-maker
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code and Claude Desktop to run multi-agent literature research: searching arXiv and OpenAlex for papers and producing cited literature reviews. Every cited statement is fact-checked against the paper it cites, so references cannot be fabricated.
      MIT

    • synorive

      Aevorine
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Code with local-first multimodal semantic search across documents, code, images, and video, plus multi-engine web research with active counter-evidence hunting and source-verified, extract-only briefings.
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    • footnote

      adwitiyashukla
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
      MIT

    • Reviewer Zero

      Rishab-Ghosh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables pre-submission review of ML papers inside Claude Code or Claude Desktop by checking format and anonymization risks, resolving every reference, finding prior work for each claim, verifying quotes against the PDF, and running methodology and writing checks. It reports findings only, never scores, ratings, or accept/reject verdicts, and never rewrites the author's text.
      7
      MIT

    • starbuck-mcp

      tiagojct
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify manuscript references against public scholarly records, checking that cited works exist, match their citations, and have not been retracted or flagged. It also lets an agent gather the best source passages for each citing sentence and record its own claim-support verdicts back into the report.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of selecting the wrong one. The description clearly delineates its scope (multi-agent document review) with an explicit mutual-exclusivity rule between `content` and `url`.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single name `review_document` follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention and is self-explanatory. With only one tool there is no pattern to cross-check, so consistency is trivially satisfied but unverifiable.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is defensible for a narrow, single-capability server, but the surface is thin: everything (fact-checking, counter-case, structure, copy edit, originality) is bundled into one opaque call with no way to request a subset of reviewers.

    Completeness3/5

    The one tool covers the full review report in a single call, but a job that 'takes a few minutes' has no status/polling or async retrieval path, and there is no follow-up operation (e.g. re-review a revised draft or compare versions). Agents can work around this by re-invoking, but it is a notable gap for a long-running operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources