Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to HydraGraph MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Compiler-exact TypeScript code graph MCP server exposing find-references, change impact analysis, and repo map tools for AI agents, powered by the TypeScript compiler via ts-morph.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that indexes TypeScript/JavaScript codebases into precise call and import graphs using the TypeScript compiler API, allowing Claude or any MCP client to query definitions, callers, callees, and perform impact analysis.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Serves a repository's code knowledge graph over stdio (MCP) so coding agents can look up symbols, trace callers and callees, compute blast radius, list file symbols, run hybrid lexical-plus-graph search, and get citation-grounded answers from file:line evidence instead of guessing from text chunks. All tools work offline straight from the graph, with prose synthesis only when an OpenAI-compatible LLM endpoint is configured.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that gives AI coding agents symbol definitions, dependency graphs, and a live architecture vocabulary for TypeScript/JavaScript repos, with no network or embeddings.
      16 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Semantic code intelligence MCP server for TypeScript/JavaScript codebases, enabling AI agents to retrieve specific symbols, types, and relationships without reading entire files.
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to retrieve focused structural context from a local code graph, inspect relationships, and carry project memory across sessions. It serves this context via MCP to reduce token usage while investigating code before making behavioral claims.
      28 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct primary purposes: find_callers for direct callers, impact_of_change for transitive blast radius, and explain_context for natural-language-driven exploration. Some overlap exists between find_callers and impact_of_change (the latter can include direct callers), but descriptions are sufficient to differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are descriptive but not uniformly patterned. find_callers and explain_context use an imperative verb_noun form, while impact_of_change is a noun_phrase. This mixed convention is still readable, but inconsistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the lower end but reasonable for a focused code-analysis server covering direct query, impact analysis, and natural-language explanation. The set does not feel overly thin given the specificity of the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core workflow of understanding callers and change impact. Missing explicit callee querying or symbol metadata retrieval could be gaps, but impact_of_change likely subsumes some of those needs. Overall, the surface is workable for its apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues