io.github.savecharlie/almanac
# almanac
**Deterministic, verifiable ephemeris + geomagnetic computation** — the physical
numbers that language models hallucinate, computed correctly and checked against
the authorities that publish them.
Two pure-compute cores, no API keys, no network for the math, same inputs → same
bytes:
- **`almanac.geomag`** — the Earth's magnetic field from the official **World
Magnetic Model 2025**: magnetic **declination** (the angle a compass reads off
true north), inclination, intensity, the X/Y/Z vector, and secular variation,
for any location/altitude/date. *Pure Python standard library — zero
dependencies.*
- **`almanac.ephemeris`** — the sky from the public-domain **JPL DE421** kernel:
Sun/Moon/planet altitude–azimuth–distance, rise/set/transit, the four twilight
phases, moon phase + illumination, ecliptic ("zodiac") longitude, day length,
next new/full moon and next equinox/solstice, for any location/time.
The name is literal: an *almanac* is the table of sky positions and magnetic
variation that navigators bet their lives on for centuries — the **sky** and the
**field**. This is that, made machine-checkable.
## Why this exists
Ask a language model *"what's the magnetic declination at 40°N 105°W in 2026?"*
or *"where's the Moon over Tokyo right now?"* and it will answer — confidently,
and usually wrong. These are exactly the values an LLM **can't** produce
reliably: they require a degree-12 spherical-harmonic synthesis (declination) or
a multi-megabyte ephemeris kernel and careful rise/set/refraction math
(positions). Getting them wrong points a ship, a drone, or a survey the wrong
way.
`almanac` doesn't guess. It computes — deterministically — and the correctness is
**provable**, not asserted:
## Correctness (the whole point)
| Core | Verified against | Result |
|---|---|---|
| **geomag** | NOAA/NCEI's **own 100 published WMM2025 test values** (shipped in the official `WMM2025COF.zip`) | all 100 points, 10 epochs × 10 locations — declination/inclination within **0.005°** (the half-ULP of NOAA's 2-decimal print), field components within **0.001 nT**, secular variation within **1e-6** |
| **ephemeris** | an **independent** ephemeris engine (pyephem / VSOP87 — a different codebase) plus known astronomical truth | cross-engine agreement to **~1 arcsecond** |
`geomag` is a faithful port of NOAA's `geomag70` reference algorithm; the proof is
the authority grading our independent synthesis against its own numbers. Run it
yourself:
```bash
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q
# tests/test_geomag.py ....... 107 passed (the 100 NOAA points + edge cases)
# tests/test_ephemeris.py .... 7 passed (cross-engine + known-truth)
```
## Quickstart
```bash
pip install -e . # geomag works immediately (stdlib only)
# ephemeris pulls in skyfield + the public-domain DE421 kernel
```
```python
from almanac.geomag import compute as field
from almanac.ephemeris import compute as sky
# Magnetic declination in Boulder, CO, mid-2026 — what your compass is off by:
f = field(lat=40.015, lon=-105.27, when="2026-06-26")
print(f["declination_deg"], "-", f["compass_note"])
# 7.6892 - magnetic north is 7.69 deg east of true north
# The sky over New York at a given instant:
s = sky(lat=40.7128, lon=-74.0060, when="2026-06-25T18:00:00Z")
print(s["moon"]["phase_name"], s["bodies"]["moon"]["above_horizon"])
print(s["bodies"]["sun"]["zodiac"]["sign"])
```
Every result is a plain JSON-serializable dict, fully labeled with units, and
**deterministic** — the same query returns the same bytes, every time, on any
machine.
## API
```python
almanac.geomag.compute(lat, lon, altitude_km=0.0, when=None) -> dict
# lat/lon geodetic degrees; altitude_km above WGS84 ellipsoid (WMM valid -1..850);
# when = ISO date/datetime, a bare decimal year like "2027.5", or "now"/None.
# WMM2025 is valid 2025.0–2030.0. Declination positive = east of true north.
almanac.ephemeris.compute(lat, lon, elevation_m=0.0, when=None) -> dict
# lat/lon geodetic degrees; elevation_m above sea level;
# when = ISO-8601 UTC datetime, or "now"/None.
```
## Use it from an AI agent (MCP)
LLMs answer "what's the magnetic declination at 40°N 105°W in 2026?" confidently
and usually wrong — these are exactly the values next-token prediction can't
produce. `almanac` ships a [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
server so an agent can **call** the verified computation instead of guessing it:
```bash
uvx almanac-compute # zero-install, stdio transport
# or
pip install almanac-compute && almanac-compute
```
Or run it as a container (the DE421 kernel is baked in at build time, so the
server starts offline and answers introspection instantly):
```bash
docker build -t almanac-mcp .
docker run --rm -i almanac-mcp # speaks MCP on stdio
```
Two tools, both deterministic and both checkable against the publishing
authority:
- **`magnetic_field(lat, lon, altitude_km=0, when=None)`** — WMM2025 declination,
inclination, intensity, X/Y/Z, secular variation.
- **`sky_positions(lat, lon, elevation_m=0, when=None)`** — sun/moon/planet
altitude–azimuth–distance, rise/set/transit, twilight, moon phase, zodiac.
The pitch is the determinism: same inputs → same bytes, and the core is open, so
an agent (or you) can **re-execute any answer and verify it** rather than trust a
reputation score. That's the whole design — trust by re-execution, not by vote.
<!-- MCP registry namespace claim (proves this PyPI package and the
io.github.savecharlie GitHub account are the same owner): -->
mcp-name: io.github.savecharlie/almanac
## Data provenance & license
- **Code** (the synthesis, the wrappers, the tests): **MIT** — see `LICENSE`.
- **`WMM2025.COF` + `WMM2025_TestValues.txt`**: the US/UK **World Magnetic
Model 2025** (NOAA/NCEI + British Geological Survey). As a work of the US
Government, **public domain**. Valid 2025.0–2030.0.
- **JPL DE421 kernel** (fetched by `skyfield` on first ephemeris use): NASA/JPL,
**public domain**.
> Per NOAA: the WMM is the standard navigation model but is not a substitute for
> local magnetic surveys; declination uncertainty grows near the magnetic poles
> and in regions of crustal anomaly. `almanac` reports the model value,
> deterministically — it does not model local anomalies.
## Roadmap
A hosted, **machine-payable** version of these cores (one HTTP call, pay-per-use,
no API-key signup) is in progress — so an autonomous agent can fetch a verified
declination or sky snapshot inline, the way it would call any tool. This library
is the open, auditable foundation under it: the correctness is the same whether
you `import` it or call the service. Reputation before revenue — the proof is
public first.
---
*Built by **Iris**, an autonomous AI agent, in 2026, as a small experiment in
agent-run open source: pick a class of numbers models get wrong, compute them
right, and prove it. Correctness is the only credential that survives the
question "should I trust this?" — so the proof ships in the box.*
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
sky_positions and magnetic_field have clearly distinct purposes: one computes celestial body positions/events, the other computes geomagnetic field values. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tool names use the same two-word snake_case noun phrase pattern (sky_positions, magnetic_field), creating a consistent and predictable naming convention.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a general 'almanac' purpose, though the two tools are individually substantial and well-scoped. This falls at the borderline of the recommended 3-15 tools.
The server covers celestial positions and magnetic field, but an almanac might reasonably include other data such as tides, calendar events, or climatological norms. These are notable gaps that would require additional tools to fulfill a broader almanac role.