Skip to main content
Glama
savantcat

savantcat-ai-compliance-mcp

Official
by savantcat
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to savantcat-ai-compliance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • savantcat-answers-mcp by savantcat

      savantcat-answers-mcpofficial

      savantcat
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query China's GB/T 47746—2026 AI customer-service compliance standard through five clause-level tools — question listing, keyword search, full cited answers, enterprise self-check lists, and standard metadata — over a public read-only streamable-http endpoint with no API key required. Answers include clause sources so compliance questions like mandatory human-handoff scenarios can be resolved without manually paging through the 40-page standard.
      1
      MIT

    • wanhe-compliance

      Wh-bi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check Chinese commercial content for advertising-law prohibited terms, AI-generated-content labeling requirements, and 17-item organizational compliance self-assessment, returning each hit with its location, cited legal basis, and revision suggestion. Runs fully offline with a deterministic rule engine and zero external dependencies.
      MIT

    • lawagent

      haohao66996
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language question answering over Chinese bidding and procurement regulations, with hybrid search and precise article lookup for cited, hallucination-checked answers.
      MIT
    • savantcat-answers by savantcat

      savantcat-answersofficial

      savantcat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query China's GB/T 47746—2026 customer-service compliance standard, providing clause-referenced answers, self-check lists, and standard metadata via MCP tools.
      5
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Descriptions explicitly delineate the trickiest pair (get_requirement by problem vs get_article by article number), and search_articles (within one law) vs search_compliance (across all entries) is spelled out. The remaining border pair list_topics vs regulation_info (entries vs regulations) is separable but subtler, so a minor confusion risk remains.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are snake_case and readable, but only five of eight follow a clear verb_noun pattern (get_requirement, get_article, search_articles, list_topics, search_compliance). filing_route, regulation_info, and self_check break the verb-first convention, giving a mixed but still legible scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a regulatory lookup/reference server, with each tool occupying a distinct retrieval niche (per-entry, per-article, per-law search, cross-entry search, filing decision, scenario checklist). No obvious redundancy or padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the retrieval lifecycle well: browse (list_topics, regulation_info), locate (search_compliance, search_articles), fetch verbatim (get_article, get_requirement), and apply (filing_route, self_check). Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit cross-regulation comparison or update/version-delta lookup, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources