Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
# vibe-prompt-mcp

[![npm version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/vibe-prompt-mcp)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/vibe-prompt-mcp)
[![npm downloads](https://img.shields.io/npm/dm/vibe-prompt-mcp)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/vibe-prompt-mcp)
[![license](https://img.shields.io/npm/l/vibe-prompt-mcp)](LICENSE)

> **Every vague prompt costs you 2–3 follow-up messages.**
> This MCP fixes your prompt before it reaches the AI — so you get the right output on the first try.

`vibe-prompt-mcp` scores your prompt across 4 quality dimensions, rewrites the weak parts, and fills in what's missing. The AI gets a precise instruction. You get fewer iterations.

No API key. No account. No server to run. Works inside Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, and any stdio MCP client.

---

## The problem it solves

You send a prompt. The AI produces something close but not quite right. You clarify. It tries again. You say "also add loading states." Another round. "Make it responsive." One more.

**Three iterations to get what you could have specified upfront.**

`vibe-prompt-mcp` catches the gaps before the prompt is sent — vague verbs, subjective language, missing acceptance criteria, absent style stack — and fixes them automatically. The AI gets one clear instruction instead of a guessing game.

---

## See it in action

### Example 1 — vague UI prompt

**Before:**
```
can you please improve the login page, it looks bad and i want it to feel more modern
```
*Score: 76/100 — 5 issues detected*

**After `optimize_prompt`:**
```
please redesign the login page, it looks bad and i want it to use
Inter font, neutral color palette, 8px border radius, consistent
16px grid spacing. Done when: the page renders correctly on mobile
and desktop with no console errors. Use Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui.
```
*Score: 78/100 — filler stripped, vague terms replaced, missing specs appended*

### Example 2 — feature request with missing specs

**Before:**
```
Add a notifications bell icon to the navbar that shows unread count
and a dropdown list of recent notifications with mark-as-read functionality
```
*Score: 79/100 — 3 issues detected*

**After `optimize_prompt`:**
```
Add a notifications bell icon to the navbar that shows unread count
and a dropdown list of recent notifications with mark-as-read
functionality. Done when: the list renders correctly on mobile and
desktop with no console errors. Use Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui.
Include loading, error, and empty states.
```
*Score: 84/100 — acceptance criteria, style stack, and state requirements added*

Without this, you'd have built the feature — then asked about loading states, then responsive layout, then the empty state. **Three follow-ups eliminated upfront.**

---

## How it works

`vibe-prompt-mcp` runs **entirely on your machine** as a local Node.js process. It uses no AI, makes no API calls, and sends nothing to any external service.

Under the hood it's a rule engine — 18 rules across 4 dimensions — that analyzes the structure and language of your prompt, detects patterns that consistently cause poor AI output, and applies targeted fixes. Think of it as a linter for prompts.

**What this means for you:**

- **Zero AI cost for the optimization itself.** The only tokens spent are ~130 for the tool call overhead (your message + Claude routing the request + the response).
- **Net savings come from avoiding re-iterations.** Each back-and-forth cycle with the AI costs 500–1,000+ tokens. One optimized prompt that gets it right on the first try pays for itself immediately.
- **Runs offline.** No network call is made during optimization.

This is the core difference from AI-based prompt improvers — those spend tokens to save tokens. This one doesn't.

---

## Quick start

**Step 1 — Add to your AI tool** (pick your platform below)

**Step 2 — Use it**

Ask your AI in plain language:
```
optimize this prompt: [your prompt here]
```
```
score this prompt: [your prompt here]
```
```
optimize in verbose mode: [your prompt here]
```

**Step 3 — Send the result**

Copy the rewritten prompt and use it as your actual instruction.

---

## Add to your AI tool

### Claude Code

**Option A — project-level** (recommended, checked into source control and shared with your team):

Create `.mcp.json` at your project root:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-prompt-mcp": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "vibe-prompt-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
```

**Option B — global** (available in every project on your machine):

```bash
claude mcp add vibe-prompt-mcp -s user -- npx -y vibe-prompt-mcp
```

Restart Claude Code, then type `/mcp` to confirm `vibe-prompt-mcp` appears with both tools listed.

### Cursor

Settings → MCP → Add new server:
- **Name**: `vibe-prompt-mcp`
- **Command**: `npx`
- **Args**: `-y vibe-prompt-mcp`

### Windsurf

Add to `~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json`:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-prompt-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "vibe-prompt-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
```

### Zed

Add to `.zed/settings.json`:

```json
{
  "context_servers": {
    "vibe-prompt-mcp": {
      "command": {
        "path": "npx",
        "args": ["-y", "vibe-prompt-mcp"]
      }
    }
  }
}
```

### Antigravity

Add to `~/.gemini/antigravity/mcp_config.json`:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-prompt-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "vibe-prompt-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
```

### Lovable / Replit / Codex (HTTP)

These platforms require a deployed remote endpoint. The package ships an HTTP server:

```bash
node node_modules/vibe-prompt-mcp/dist/http.js
# Express on port 3000 (or $PORT) — MCP endpoint: POST /mcp
```

Deploy to Railway or Render and point the platform's MCP URL to `https://YOUR_HOST/mcp`.

---

## Scoring dimensions

Each dimension is worth 25 points. Total score: **0–100**.

| Dimension | What it evaluates |
|---|---|
| **Clarity** | Vague action verbs, subjective descriptors, contradictory requirements, pronoun ambiguity |
| **Specificity** | Acceptance criteria, style framework, error/loading/empty states, data shape definitions |
| **Completeness** | Scope boundaries, responsive and accessibility constraints, tech stack, context references |
| **Efficiency** | Filler language, meta-commentary, hedge phrases, duplicate context |

**Severity:**
- 🔴 Critical — high likelihood of wrong output
- ⚠ Warn — reduces quality or causes follow-up iterations
- ✦ Info — noise with no instructional value

---

## Running locally from source

```bash
git clone https://github.com/saurabhjambure-pixel/vibe-prompt-mcp
cd vibe-prompt-mcp
npm install
npm run build        # TypeScript → dist/
npm run dev          # stdio server, hot reload
npm run start:http   # HTTP server on port 3000
```

To use your local build instead of npx:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-prompt-mcp": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/path/to/vibe-prompt-mcp/dist/index.js"]
    }
  }
}
```

---

## Contributing

Issues and PRs welcome. If you have a rule idea — a pattern you keep seeing that produces poor AI output — open an issue.

---

## License

MIT

TDQS

D1.8/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The two tools, score_prompt and optimize_prompt, suggest distinct actions, though the lack of descriptions leaves some room for overlap. An agent could generally tell them apart by verb alone.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow the same lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern: score_prompt and optimize_prompt. The naming is fully consistent.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels minimal and near the thin end of the acceptable range. It could be sufficient for a narrowly scoped prompt-tuning server, but the purpose is unclear without descriptions.

Completeness2/5

The surface covers scoring and optimizing prompts but lacks obvious supporting operations such as generation, comparison, or iteration. The missing descriptions also make it hard to confirm that the intended workflow is fully covered.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues