list_team_members

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description only states it returns data, no behavioral details beyond that. No annotations provided, so description should disclose side effects, authentication needs, or error conditions, but it does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is fairly concise, though the parameter documentation is slightly redundant with the schema. No wasted sentences, but could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return value details are not required. However, the description does not mention input validation, error handling, or team existence checks. Adequate but with gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value by explicitly explaining the 'id' parameter as the team identifier, which compensates for the input schema's lack of description. Only one parameter, well-covered.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns the number of members and lists each member, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_team' which retrieves team info rather than member list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.