create_summit_zenox_ze_v1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description solely bears the responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It mentions the asset type and animations but omits critical details such as whether existing assets are replaced, the effect of the 'clear_existing' parameter, required permissions, or error states.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the core purpose. It is concise without redundancy, but the brevity leaves out essential details that could be added without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown) and the complexity of the tool (creating a character with animations), the description is incomplete. It lacks parameter explanation, usage context, and differentiation from sibling tools, which are necessary for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter ('clear_existing') with 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not mention or explain the parameter. The agent receives no guidance on its purpose or how to use it, forcing reliance on the parameter name alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a specific asset 'Zenox Ze V1' and describes its nature as a 'sperm-like harvester with many tails (idle/walk/harvest)'. The verb 'Build' indicates construction, and the unique name distinguishes it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_summit_bobcat' or 'create_summit_scavenger'. The description lacks context on prerequisites, typical use cases, or differentiating factors.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.