Skip to main content
Glama
satoshkin-dev

Satoshkin AML/KYT MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Satoshkin AML/KYT MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Crypto APIs AML, enabling verification of blockchain addresses and screening of transactions for fraud, sanctions, and other AML risk categories.
      2
      14 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Infinihash KYT providing real-time blockchain transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and SAR generation. It enables MCP-compatible agents to screen wallets against OFAC SDN and generate compliance cases.
      10
      41 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for wallet auth: read wallet state on-chain, evaluate against conditions, return an ECDSA-signed boolean with a post-quantum companion signature. Condition-based access across 37 chains (EVM, Solana, XRPL, Bitcoin, Tron, Stellar, Sui). No balances, no identity, no shared secrets; verifiable offline via JWKS. 27 tools: wallet attestation, trust profiles, payment verification.
      27
      136 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, including customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and SAR filing, compliant with 6AMLD, UK MLR 2017, and FinCEN.
      4
      39 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Deterministic read-only Solana wallet intelligence and risk evidence MCP server with 8 tools for wallet analysis, risk scoring, transaction-cited evidence graphs, SPL token security, and live token pricing.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (check_wallet_aml) with snake_case, which is consistent with common conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only one tool, the server feels under-scoped for an AML/KYT domain that typically requires multiple operations (e.g., batch checks, reporting, history). A single tool is too narrow for the stated purpose.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool covers a single check operation with detailed risk data, but lacks any additional capabilities like listing, updating, or managing alerts. The domain of AML/KYT implies a richer tool surface, so this is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues