Skip to main content
Glama
satoshkin-dev

Satoshkin AML/KYT MCP Server

Official
by satoshkin-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Satoshkin AML/KYT MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • @cryptoapis-io/mcp-aml by CryptoAPIs-io

      @cryptoapis-io/mcp-amlofficial

      CryptoAPIs-io
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Crypto APIs AML, enabling verification of blockchain addresses and screening of transactions for fraud, sanctions, and other AML risk categories.
      2
      260 npm
      MIT
    • infinihash-kyt-mcp by Infinihash

      infinihash-kyt-mcpofficial

      Infinihash
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Infinihash KYT providing real-time blockchain transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and SAR generation. It enables MCP-compatible agents to screen wallets against OFAC SDN and generate compliance cases.
      10
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-server-insumer

      insumerapi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for on-chain attestation and wallet trust profiles across 31 EVM chains and Solana. Privacy-preserving boolean verification, ECDSA-signed responses, compliance templates.
      27
      459 npm
      1
      MIT
    • yaml-ai-mcp by CSOAI-ORG

      yaml-ai-mcpofficial

      CSOAI-ORG
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, including customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and SAR filing, compliant with 6AMLD, UK MLR 2017, and FinCEN.
      4
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (check_wallet_aml) with snake_case, which is consistent with common conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only one tool, the server feels under-scoped for an AML/KYT domain that typically requires multiple operations (e.g., batch checks, reporting, history). A single tool is too narrow for the stated purpose.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool covers a single check operation with detailed risk data, but lacks any additional capabilities like listing, updating, or managing alerts. The domain of AML/KYT implies a richer tool surface, so this is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources