retro-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to retro-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceGenerates engineering intelligence reports (standups, weekly summaries, sprint retrospectives) from GitHub and Jira data, accessible via MCP clients or CLI.104 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSummarizes Slack activity and GitLab merge requests with OpenAI to help generate daily standups, weekly reports, or quarterly check-ins.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGenerates daily standup drafts from your actual GitHub, Jira, Linear, and Slack activity, grouping work items and detecting blockers.553 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceGenerates AI-powered daily and weekly productivity summaries by analyzing your Slack messages, Google Calendar events, and Gmail activity with automated scheduling and smart filtering.6-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables engineering leaders to query their AI assistant for quality KPIs — MTTR, MTTA, DORA metrics, defect escape rate and SLA breaches — computed from Jira bug, incident and deployment CSV exports already on hand. It delivers trends, period comparisons, hotspot findings and ready-to-share executive summaries and HTML dashboards without a BI stack or data warehouse.10MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAnalyzes git repository metrics to understand team health, development patterns, code quality, and collaboration through natural language queries. Provides insights on commit statistics, bus factor, velocity trends, technical debt, and burnout detection.1213 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the retrospective workflow: raw metrics, generated brief, discussion prompts, action item follow-up, sprint comparison, and source configuration. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.
All names use snake_case and most follow a noun_verb or noun_noun pattern with a clear domain prefix (retro_, discussion_, action_item_, sprint_). 'list_sources' uses a verb_noun pattern, which is a minor deviation but still readable and consistent in style.
Six tools is well within the ideal range for a domain-specific server. Each tool addresses a necessary part of the retrospective process, and none are redundant or superfluous.
The tool surface covers the full retrospective lifecycle: generate evidence-based insights, produce a summary brief, prompt discussion, review prior action items, and compare sprints. Optional source listing rounds out the set without any obvious gaps.