Skip to main content
Glama
sassoftware

SAS MCP Server

Official
by sassoftware
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SAS MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Netmind Code Interpreter

      protagolabs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure cloud-based execution of code across 14+ programming languages within a sandboxed environment. It supports file management, standard input/output handling, and automatic generation of visual artifacts like plots and charts.
      MIT

    • ssh-mcp-server

      classfang
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables secure remote command execution and bidirectional file transfers on SSH servers through the Model Context Protocol. It features robust security controls including command whitelisting, credential isolation, and support for multiple SSH connection profiles.
      1,646 npm
      989
      ISC

    • KB Platform MCP Server

      Syntax753
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables governed, audit-traced AI access to a curated knowledge base through the Model Context Protocol, with OAuth 2.1 authentication and policy enforcement for secure, compliant queries.
      Apache 2.0

    • workbook

      shinyobjectz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to execute notebook cells, manage environments, and validate workbooks via MCP, facilitating reproducible machine-learning answers.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 115 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools are clearly separated by domain and action, but the generic decisioning tools overlap substantially with the business-rules-specific tools (list/get/delete/lock/revision variants), and register_ml_champion_model vs publish_ml_champion_model is easy to confuse. The detailed descriptions help, but the set still presents multiple valid-looking paths for the same underlying operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case verb_noun patterns such as list_*, get_*, create_*, update_*, delete_*, validate_*, and publish_*. Domain prefixes like catalog_ and names like catalog_search_helper are predictable variations rather than a break in convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 115 tools, this is far beyond the 50+ threshold where tool selection becomes a serious burden. Even for a broad SAS Viya platform, this surface is large enough that it should be split into multiple scoped servers or tool groups.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is very broad: decisioning, business rules, MAS scoring, reports, jobs, AutoML/model repository, glossary/catalog, CAS/compute data, files, and uploads all have meaningful lifecycle operations. Minor gaps remain, such as file deletion, CAS table deletion, sparse model-repository operations beyond listing/register/publish, and some revision getters.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources