Skip to main content
Glama

Get Flutter Widget Details [Pro]

flutter_get_widget_details

Retrieve properties, children, render bounds, and source location for a Flutter widget using its valueId from flutter_get_widget_tree. Specify subtree depth to control detail level.

Instructions

[Pro] Get detailed information about a specific widget by its valueId (obtained from flutter_get_widget_tree). Returns properties, children, render bounds, and source location.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
value_idYesThe valueId of the widget from the widget tree
subtree_depthNoHow many levels of children to include (default: 2)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description discloses return types (properties, children, bounds, location). However, lacks details on side effects, rate limits, or auth needs, which would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no fluff. Could combine 'Pro' tag and mention of return types more efficiently, but overall concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, description partially covers return values. No instructions on error handling or performance considerations. Adequate for a detailed getter, but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description briefly mentions valueId source but adds no extra semantics beyond schema for subtree_depth.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it gets details for a specific widget using valueId, listing return types. No explicit differentiation from siblings, but context implies unique purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use after flutter_get_widget_tree (mentions valueId from it), but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use, and sibling tools like flutter_find_widget are not distinguished.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/saranshbamania/mobile-device-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server