Skip to main content
Glama
saralegui-solutions

MCP Self-Learning Server

analyze_pattern

Analyzes interaction patterns to learn from usage data, enabling autonomous improvement through pattern recognition and machine learning techniques.

Instructions

Analyze and learn from interaction patterns

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
interactionYes

Implementation Reference

  • Registration of the 'analyze_pattern' tool in the ListToolsRequestSchema handler, including name, description, and input schema definition.
    {
      name: 'analyze_pattern',
      description: 'Analyze and learn from interaction patterns',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          interaction: {
            type: 'object',
            properties: {
              type: { type: 'string' },
              input: { type: 'string' },
              output: { type: 'string' },
              context: { type: 'object' },
              performance: { type: 'object' },
              success: { type: 'boolean' }
            },
            required: ['type', 'input', 'output']
          }
        },
        required: ['interaction']
      }
  • The primary handler function for the 'analyze_pattern' tool, which extracts the interaction argument and delegates to the LearningEngine for analysis, then returns structured results including features and recommendations.
    async handleAnalyzePattern(args) {
      const { interaction } = args;
      const pattern = await this.learningEngine.analyzePattern(interaction);
      
      return {
        success: true,
        patternId: pattern.id,
        features: this.learningEngine.extractFeatures(pattern),
        recommendations: this.learningEngine.generateRecommendations({
          features: this.learningEngine.extractFeatures(pattern),
          confidence: 0.5
        })
      };
  • Input schema definition for the 'analyze_pattern' tool, specifying the structure of the required 'interaction' object.
    inputSchema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {
        interaction: {
          type: 'object',
          properties: {
            type: { type: 'string' },
            input: { type: 'string' },
            output: { type: 'string' },
            context: { type: 'object' },
            performance: { type: 'object' },
            success: { type: 'boolean' }
          },
          required: ['type', 'input', 'output']
        }
      },
      required: ['interaction']
    }
  • Core helper function in LearningEngine that performs pattern analysis: creates pattern object, manages memory buffer, extracts features, updates patterns, triggers learning cycles, handles persistence, and emits events.
    async analyzePattern(interaction) {
      const pattern = {
        id: crypto.randomUUID(),
        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
        type: interaction.type,
        input: interaction.input,
        output: interaction.output,
        context: interaction.context,
        performance: interaction.performance,
        success: interaction.success
      };
    
      // Store in memory buffer
      this.memoryBuffer.push(pattern);
      if (this.memoryBuffer.length > this.maxMemorySize) {
        await this.consolidateMemory();
      }
    
      // Extract features
      const features = this.extractFeatures(pattern);
      
      // Update pattern recognition
      await this.updatePatterns(features);
      
      // Trigger learning if threshold met
      if (this.shouldTriggerLearning()) {
        await this.performLearningCycle();
      }
    
      // Auto-save if interval elapsed
      if (this.shouldAutoSave()) {
        await this.saveToFile();
      }
    
      this.emit('pattern-analyzed', pattern);
      return pattern;
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Analyze and learn' suggests a read-only analysis and a learning/mutation component, but it doesn't clarify whether this tool modifies data, requires specific permissions, has side effects, or what the output entails. The description is too vague to inform the agent about behavioral traits beyond the basic action implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient phrase: 'Analyze and learn from interaction patterns.' It's front-loaded with the core action and resource, with no wasted words. Every part of the sentence contributes to the tool's purpose, making it appropriately sized for a brief description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (1 parameter with nested objects, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'analyze' and 'learn' entail operationally, what the input fields represent, or what the tool returns. For a tool with rich input structure and potential behavioral implications, more detail is needed to guide the agent effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for undocumented parameters. The description mentions 'interaction patterns,' which hints at the 'interaction' parameter in the schema, but doesn't explain what fields like 'type,' 'input,' 'output,' 'context,' 'performance,' or 'success' mean or how they should be used. With 1 parameter (a nested object with 6 sub-properties) and no schema descriptions, the description adds minimal semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Analyze and learn from interaction patterns' states a general purpose but lacks specificity about what resource or data is being analyzed. It mentions 'interaction patterns' which aligns with the input schema's 'interaction' object, but doesn't distinguish this tool from siblings like 'get_insights' or 'get_performance_metrics' which might also analyze patterns. The purpose is vague but not tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With siblings like 'get_insights' and 'get_performance_metrics' that might overlap in analyzing interactions, there's no indication of when this tool is preferred or what specific context it serves. Usage is implied only by the tool name and description, with no explicit when/when-not statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/saralegui-solutions/mcp-self-learning-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server