get_keyframe_image
Retrieve a keyframe image from a bug report by specifying the report ID and keyframe index.
Instructions
Return a keyframe image for a report by its index.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| index | Yes | ||
| report_id | Yes |
Retrieve a keyframe image from a bug report by specifying the report ID and keyframe index.
Return a keyframe image for a report by its index.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| index | Yes | ||
| report_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only states the function without mentioning what the return value is (e.g., image URL, binary data) or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff, but it lacks structure. It could benefit from front-loading the purpose and adding brief parameter details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of an output schema and annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not specify the output format (e.g., image data, URL) or any constraints, making it incomplete for inference.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no extra meaning to parameters. 'index' and 'report_id' are not explained (e.g., index base, valid report IDs).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Return') and the resource ('keyframe image for a report by its index'), effectively distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_video_gif' or 'get_report'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites or provide context for selection among many sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/santoshshinde2012/framesleuth'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server