Skip to main content
Glama
santiv343

outlook-local-mcp

by santiv343

Related Servers

Alternatives to outlook-local-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns your running Outlook Desktop into an MCP server, enabling email, calendar, tasks, and attachment management through your existing Outlook session without any cloud APIs.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-aware agents to interact with the classic Outlook desktop client for mail, calendar, contacts, tasks, and Out-of-Office settings via the COM API, without Azure or OAuth.
      179 PyPI
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for email + calendar via classic Outlook on Windows (COM automation). No Azure app registration, no OAuth — it just drives the Outlook desktop client you're already signed into.
      23 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides LLMs with access to Microsoft Outlook email functionality, allowing them to read, search, compose, and manage emails through a standardized MCP interface on Windows.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects to Windows Classic Outlook to automate email organization, search, and reply draft creation without sending emails.
      214 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to classic desktop Outlook mailbox and calendar on Windows, enabling safe email and calendar queries without any write capabilities.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (folders, status, mailboxes, emails, conversation), but recent_emails and search_emails overlap in listing emails and could be confused. Descriptions clarify when to use each (recent_emails for overview, search_emails for queries), but the boundary remains somewhat fuzzy.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming mostly follows verb_noun (list_folders, list_mailboxes, recent_emails, search_emails, read_email, read_conversation), but outlook_status breaks the pattern with noun_status, and recent_emails uses an adjective. Minor deviations from an otherwise consistent convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for an Outlook local MCP server, covering essential operations like folder listing, status, mailbox listing, email listing/search/reading, and conversation reading. Each tool has a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers key read operations (folders, mailboxes, emails, conversations, status), but lacks write operations like sending, replying, moving, or deleting emails. For a local Outlook integration, read-only may be a design choice, but common email workflows would require additional tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive