neovim-use-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to neovim-use-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMake Neovim feel like Cursor. This MCP server gives an agent full control over the Neovim session it is running inside, including buffers, windows, diagnostics, LSP language intelligence, and terminals.23MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to control Neovim instances running in tmux sessions.12-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes LSP-backed code navigation and editing tools to LLM agents using a single global config file to route file extensions to language servers.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server bridging tool calls to Neovim editor actions via RPC. Enables AI agents to open files, run Lua, manage quickfix lists, fetch diagnostics, and send notifications.GPL 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents see, act on, and verify the rendered Neovim UI, like a Playwright for Neovim. It provides tools to launch/attach to Neovim, observe the screen, send input, and wait for conditions.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that lets your coding agent see the squiggles — LSP diagnostics, navigation, refactoring, and each server's custom superpowers2148 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct responsibility: LSP lookups (hover, definition, references), mutations (rename, edit, format, code actions), file I/O (read, open), and an escape hatch (exec lua). Even the similar-looking open vs read tools differ clearly in purpose: one returns buffer metadata, the other returns file content.
All tools share the consistent nvim_ prefix and most use a verb_noun pattern like nvim_read_file and nvim_rename_symbol. Minor deviations like nvim_references and nvim_code_actions being noun phrases, plus bare-verb tools like nvim_format and nvim_hover, keep this from being a perfect 5.
10 tools is a well-scoped set for a Neovim-powered editing and LSP server. Each tool covers a meaningful operation, and there is no obvious redundancy or bloat.
The core workflows are well covered: read, open, edit, format, rename, reference lookup, definition lookup, hover info, and code actions. Minor gaps exist around secondary LSP features like a dedicated diagnostics-only tool, document symbols, or explicit file create/delete operations, but agents can work around these.