Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal Model Context Protocol server in TypeScript that demonstrates MCP-compliant resources and tools for LLMs, featuring simple resources and a basic tool that echoes messages or returns greetings.
      1
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A demonstration TypeScript MCP server that showcases basic MCP concepts with simple tools (greeting, calculator), text resources, and prompt templates for learning the Model Context Protocol.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal test MCP server built with TypeScript, demonstrating basic Model Context Protocol capabilities like tools, resources, and prompts.
      20 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implemented in TypeScript that provides resources, tools (calculator, weather, timestamp), and prompts for integration with LLMs.
      221 npm
      ISC
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK. Includes example tools like calculator and greeting functions, plus system information resources.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example implementations of tools (calculator, greeting) and resources (server info).
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools, making disambiguation perfect. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently follows a consistent naming pattern, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'greet' is straightforward and appropriate.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and suggests an incomplete or trivial implementation. This is borderline for a meaningful MCP server scope.

    Completeness1/5

    The server's purpose is unclear from the single tool, but 'greet' alone suggests severe incompleteness for any practical domain. There are obvious gaps, as no other operations are supported, making the surface inadequate.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues