Skip to main content
Glama
sanjibani

mcp-shield

by sanjibani
README.md
# mcp-shield

**Security primitives for the Model Context Protocol.**

The Blackwell Systems 2026-06 audit scanned 54 production MCP servers and found **20 bugs** in 9 of them. The 2026-03-05 MCP roadmap named audit trails, SSO, and machine-readable server discovery as the four blockers keeping MCP out of regulated enterprises. **mcp-shield** is the missing security layer — five drop-in primitives that address every bug class from the audit, MIT-licensed, stdlib-only, no SaaS dependency.

```bash
pip install mcp-shield
```

## Why this exists

If you're running an MCP server — yours or someone else's — you have four problems mcp-shield solves:

1. **Tool errors return as success.** `except E: return _format_error(e)` leaves FastMCP's `isError` flag unset, so the agent retries forever. MCPTox benchmark (arXiv:2508.14925) flags this across 26+ Python MCPs.
2. **No audit trail.** SOC2 procurement requires per-call records. Building one yourself is a Friday you'll never get back.
3. **Tool output can hijack the agent.** OWASP #1 LLM vulnerability (Context Poisoning, >100K sites hit in 2025). Tool descriptions and outputs are the attack surface.
4. **No input validation.** Malformed calls from the agent crash your handler with `KeyError`, `TypeError`, etc. — not a typed error the model can correct.

## The five primitives

| Primitive | Bug class | Drop-in usage |
|---|---|---|
| `shield_tool` decorator | 1 — isError-compliance | `@shield_tool(name="my_tool", schema={...})` |
| `audit_tool_call` | 3 — JSONL audit | `with audit_tool_call("my_tool", args): ...` |
| `validate_input` | 4-adj — JSON-schema input | `validate_input(args, schema={...})` |
| `sanitize_output` | 2 — prompt-injection scrub | `sanitize_output(text, strict=True)` |
| `require_scope` | 4 — OAuth 2.1 scope | `require_scope("admin")` |

Plus: a standalone MCP server exposing `shield_audit_tail`, `shield_audit_summary`, `shield_red_team`, `shield_scan_input`, `shield_patterns_list`, `shield_sanitize_preview`, `shield_version` — register it alongside any other MCP to inspect what's happening.

## Quick start (decorator)

```python
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
from mcp_shield import shield_tool

mcp = FastMCP("my-server")

@mcp.tool()
@shield_tool(
    name="search_things",
    schema={
        "type": "object",
        "required": ["query"],
        "properties": {"query": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1, "maxLength": 200}},
        "additionalProperties": False,
    },
    sanitize_strict=False,  # redact matched patterns; True raises
    required_scopes="read",
)
async def search_things(query: str) -> str:
    result = await upstream.search(query)
    return json.dumps(result)
```

That's it. You now have:
- JSON-schema validation (rejects malformed calls with typed errors)
- JSONL audit log per call (stderr default, override with `MCP_SHIELD_AUDIT_LOG`)
- Output sanitization with 15 high-precision patterns from MCPTox + OWASP
- isError-compliance (FastMCP sets `isError: true` automatically)
- OAuth scope check

## Quick start (operational MCP server)

```bash
# Audit logs go to stderr by default
mcp-shield

# Or to a file
MCP_SHIELD_AUDIT_LOG=/var/log/mcp/audit.jsonl mcp-shield

# Or disable audit entirely (for unit tests)
MCP_SHIELD_AUDIT=0 mcp-shield
```

Then ask your MCP client: *"what was the error rate over the last hour?"* or *"run the red-team suite against my MCP."*

## What's in the box

```
src/mcp_shield/
├── __init__.py     # public surface
├── audit.py        # JSONL audit log (stdlib-only, fail-open, secret-redacting)
├── exceptions.py   # typed exception hierarchy (ShieldError, ShieldAuthError, ...)
├── sanitize.py     # prompt-injection scrubber (15 curated patterns)
├── server.py       # standalone MCP server exposing ops tools
├── shield.py       # @shield_tool decorator + ShieldedTool class + require_scope
└── validate.py     # JSON-schema input validation (Draft 7 subset)
```

## Engineering standards

Every line of code in this repo follows patterns documented in the [engineering playbook](~/.mavis/agents/mavis/memory/engineering-playbook.md) — the same playbook used by hawksoft-mcp, ezyvet-mcp, practicepanther-mcp, and the rest of the sanjibani MCP portfolio.

- **ruff**: full rule set (E/F/W/I/N/UP/B/A/C4/DTZ/T20/PT/Q/RET/SIM/TID/ARG/PTH/ERA/PL/RUF)
- **mypy --strict**: clean
- **pytest**: 53 tests, all passing, covering every primitive + edge cases
- **py.typed**: ships the marker for downstream `mypy` to type-check us
- **stdlib-only**: audit + sanitize + validate need no extra deps; only `mcp[cli]`, `httpx`, `pydantic`, `structlog` for the wrapper
- **fail-open**: a broken audit sink never breaks the tool (SOC2 baseline)
- **JSON-RPC safe**: audit goes to stderr (or file), never stdout

## Cross-promo footer

If you ship an MCP server, drop the shield on it in 5 minutes. If you don't ship one and just need to harden the ones you use, add the operational MCP server to your fleet.

If you'd rather have someone build a custom MCP server (vertical SaaS, internal tool, anything with a REST/GraphQL/SOAP API), see the [engagement page](https://sanjibani.github.io/mcp-services/) — $25K / $60K / $120K+ tiers.

Other vertical MCPs in this portfolio:
- [hawksoft-mcp](https://github.com/sanjibani/hawksoft-mcp) — independent insurance AMS
- [open-dental-mcp](https://github.com/sanjibani/open-dental-mcp) — dental practice
- [ezyvet-mcp](https://github.com/sanjibani/ezyvet-mcp) — veterinary practice
- [jobber-mcp](https://github.com/sanjibani/jobber-mcp) — home service trades
- [practicepanther-mcp](https://github.com/sanjibani/practicepanther-mcp) — legal practice mgmt

## Maintainer

Sanjibani Choudhury <schoudhury1991@gmail.com> · [github.com/sanjibani](https://github.com/sanjibani)

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: auditing (summary and tail), pattern management (list and test), sanitization preview, input validation, and version info. No overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names use snake_case and follow a verb_noun pattern (audit_summary, audit_tail, patterns_list, red_team, sanitize_preview, scan_input). Even 'version' fits as a simple noun command.

Tool Count5/5

With 7 tools, the surface is well-scoped for a security/audit server. It covers auditing, pattern introspection, testing, preview, input validation, and version info without bloat.

Completeness4/5

Covers core workflows: auditing (summary + tail), pattern listing, red team testing, sanitization preview, and input validation. Minor gaps like dynamic pattern updates or configuration are absent but not critical for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues