Generate a quiz

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not elaborate on behavioral traits beyond what annotations convey. Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and openWorldHint=true, but the description adds no details about side effects, state changes, or system interactions. It fails to disclose important behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) and front-loaded with the key action. However, it is arguably too concise, sacrificing clarity and completeness. Every sentence should earn its place, but this sentence is too vague to be fully useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, no output schema, and a lack of behavioral details, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the generated quiz contains, how it is returned (e.g., artifact ID), or any required preconditions. The description falls short of providing a complete picture.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 40% schema description coverage, only two parameters (notebook and sourceIds) have brief descriptions. The tool description does not explain the remaining parameters (quantity, difficulty, instructions) or their formats. The description adds no semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Generate' and resource 'quiz', clearly indicating the tool's purpose. However, it does not distinguish this tool from sibling tools like 'generate_flashcards' or 'generate_report', which also operate on notebook content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical use cases, or when not to use it. The description lacks any contextual direction for the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.