Skip to main content
Glama
sanggggg

Record MCP Server

by sanggggg

Related Servers

Alternatives to Record MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agent-first headless CMS running as a Cloudflare Worker, providing MCP servers for schema/content management and editorial operations.
      17 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive content management through Markdown processing, HTML rendering, intelligent fuzzy search, and document analysis. Supports frontmatter parsing, tag-based filtering, table of contents generation, and directory statistics for efficient content organization and discovery.
      5 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to save, search, and manage markdown-based research articles through a complete CRUD interface. Supports creating, reading, updating, and deleting articles with frontmatter metadata in a self-hosted file-based system.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets users manage master data through natural-language conversations with AI agents, enabling schema creation, record capture, validation, search, and query answering via 16 MCP tools backed by local JSON storage.
      16
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage data in a simple JSON file database through MCP tools and REST API. Supports creating, reading, updating, and deleting items organized in collections with auto-generated UUIDs.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: add_field_to_type modifies schemas, add_review_record creates data entries, add_review_type creates new types, get_review_type retrieves detailed type information, and list_review_types provides an overview. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_field_to_type, get_review_type, list_review_types) with clear, descriptive actions and targets. The naming is uniform and predictable throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing review types and records. The count is appropriate, covering core operations without being overly sparse or bloated, and each tool serves a necessary function in the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides good coverage for creating and retrieving review types and records, but lacks update and delete operations (e.g., update_review_type, delete_review_record). This minor gap might require workarounds but does not severely hinder core workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues