rtorrent-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to rtorrent-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for controlling rTorrent through ruTorrent's httprpc plugin, enabling torrent management (list/add/remove/start/stop), label/priority management, data movement, and global throttle settings from any MCP client.132-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that replicates Sonarr/Radarr/Lidarr functionality driven by an LLM, enabling automated torrent management for TV shows and movies.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing a media server stack (Plex, Radarr, Overseerr, Bazarr, Prowlarr, Trakt.tv) using natural language to browse, request, and discover content.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing media downloads with Radarr and Sonarr, providing granular tools for searching, adding, and grabbing movies and TV shows through natural language.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to search torrents, download them, and stream video directly to VLC while managing active downloads.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables local LLMs to manage a home media stack including Radarr, Sonarr, Prowlarr, and others.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool is a broad portmanteau with vaguely overlapping boundaries: search_management includes multi-step torrent/search workflows, workflow_management also covers multi-step torrent operations, and nlp_management can initiate search/download commands. An agent cannot reliably determine which tool should handle a given request without seeing hidden internal operations.
All tool names follow the same snake_case {domain}_management pattern, so the naming convention is predictable and consistent. However, the common suffix is a vague noun rather than an action verb, and names like system_management give little clue about what operations are actually available.
The raw count of seven tools is numerically reasonable, but each tool explicitly bundles three to twelve or more operations into a single interface. This makes the server feel under-differentiated for its broad scope and hides the true behavioral surface behind a small number of overloaded tools.
The set nominally covers the main areas of an rtorrent automation server: search, legal compliance, natural-language commands, system control, torrent/post-processing, and workflows. However, because every operation is hidden inside opaque mega-tools, completeness is asserted rather than verifiable, and agents cannot enumerate or confidently rely on the actual operations available.