Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rtorrent-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling rTorrent through ruTorrent's httprpc plugin, enabling torrent management (list/add/remove/start/stop), label/priority management, data movement, and global throttle settings from any MCP client.
      13
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that replicates Sonarr/Radarr/Lidarr functionality driven by an LLM, enabling automated torrent management for TV shows and movies.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing a media server stack (Plex, Radarr, Overseerr, Bazarr, Prowlarr, Trakt.tv) using natural language to browse, request, and discover content.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing media downloads with Radarr and Sonarr, providing granular tools for searching, adding, and grabbing movies and TV shows through natural language.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables local LLMs to manage a home media stack including Radarr, Sonarr, Prowlarr, and others.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Each tool is a broad portmanteau with vaguely overlapping boundaries: search_management includes multi-step torrent/search workflows, workflow_management also covers multi-step torrent operations, and nlp_management can initiate search/download commands. An agent cannot reliably determine which tool should handle a given request without seeing hidden internal operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow the same snake_case {domain}_management pattern, so the naming convention is predictable and consistent. However, the common suffix is a vague noun rather than an action verb, and names like system_management give little clue about what operations are actually available.

    Tool Count3/5

    The raw count of seven tools is numerically reasonable, but each tool explicitly bundles three to twelve or more operations into a single interface. This makes the server feel under-differentiated for its broad scope and hides the true behavioral surface behind a small number of overloaded tools.

    Completeness3/5

    The set nominally covers the main areas of an rtorrent automation server: search, legal compliance, natural-language commands, system control, torrent/post-processing, and workflows. However, because every operation is hidden inside opaque mega-tools, completeness is asserted rather than verifiable, and agents cannot enumerate or confidently rely on the actual operations available.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues