pdf-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to pdf-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that drives PDFium and pypdf to perform comprehensive PDF operations including inspection, assembly, page editing, watermarking, rendering, extraction, form filling, encryption, compression, attachments, bookmarks, and metadata management.MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables comprehensive PDF analysis and manipulation including page size analysis, chapter extraction, splitting, compression, merging, and conversion to images. Provides both MCP server interface for AI assistants and Streamlit web interface for direct user interaction.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that ingests PDFs, extracts structure, and provides semantic search and sequential navigation tools for AI clients to query and learn from documents.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for reading, rendering, and searching PDF files, specifically optimized for LLMs to extract text, tables, and technical diagrams. It enables metadata retrieval, multi-format text extraction, and page-to-image rendering using PyMuPDF.578MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that reads PDFs and exposes them as structured Markdown, metadata, outlines, images, and tables to LLM consumers via tools like pdf_read_markdown and pdf_info.Apache 2.0

pymupdf4llm-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for exporting PDF to markdown, optimized for LLM consumption.5,254 PyPI71AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct operations (extract, convert, annotate, forms, redact, classify, dedupe, validate). A few boundaries blur: pdf_analyze vs pdf_validate both perform structural audits, and pdf_export's markdown brief overlaps with pdf_convert's to_markdown and pdf_extract's text output.
All 16 tools use a consistent pdf_ snake_case prefix with verb-style names (pdf_extract, pdf_convert, pdf_annotate, pdf_validate). Minor deviations: pdf_rag uses a noun/acronym and pdf_do is a vague verb, but the overall pattern is predictable.
16 tools for a full PDF processing suite is reasonable; each operation (extract, convert, manipulate, annotate, forms, RAG, redact, classify, dedupe, validate, analyze, export) earns its place alongside help/status/shutdown infrastructure. Slightly heavy but well within scope.
Broad lifecycle coverage: read, transform, annotate, secure, validate, and even semantic indexing. Notable gap: pdf_analyze detects scanned PDFs but no OCR tool exists to make them usable, a common follow-on for a PDF domain. Otherwise the surface is robust with no major dead ends.