Skip to main content
Glama
sandraschi

pdf-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to pdf-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that drives PDFium and pypdf to perform comprehensive PDF operations including inspection, assembly, page editing, watermarking, rendering, extraction, form filling, encryption, compression, attachments, bookmarks, and metadata management.
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive PDF analysis and manipulation including page size analysis, chapter extraction, splitting, compression, merging, and conversion to images. Provides both MCP server interface for AI assistants and Streamlit web interface for direct user interaction.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that ingests PDFs, extracts structure, and provides semantic search and sequential navigation tools for AI clients to query and learn from documents.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, rendering, and searching PDF files, specifically optimized for LLMs to extract text, tables, and technical diagrams. It enables metadata retrieval, multi-format text extraction, and page-to-image rendering using PyMuPDF.
      5
      78
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that reads PDFs and exposes them as structured Markdown, metadata, outlines, images, and tables to LLM consumers via tools like pdf_read_markdown and pdf_info.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for exporting PDF to markdown, optimized for LLM consumption.
      5,254 PyPI
      71
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct operations (extract, convert, annotate, forms, redact, classify, dedupe, validate). A few boundaries blur: pdf_analyze vs pdf_validate both perform structural audits, and pdf_export's markdown brief overlaps with pdf_convert's to_markdown and pdf_extract's text output.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All 16 tools use a consistent pdf_ snake_case prefix with verb-style names (pdf_extract, pdf_convert, pdf_annotate, pdf_validate). Minor deviations: pdf_rag uses a noun/acronym and pdf_do is a vague verb, but the overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools for a full PDF processing suite is reasonable; each operation (extract, convert, manipulate, annotate, forms, RAG, redact, classify, dedupe, validate, analyze, export) earns its place alongside help/status/shutdown infrastructure. Slightly heavy but well within scope.

    Completeness4/5

    Broad lifecycle coverage: read, transform, annotate, secure, validate, and even semantic indexing. Notable gap: pdf_analyze detects scanned PDFs but no OCR tool exists to make them usable, a common follow-on for a PDF domain. Otherwise the surface is robust with no major dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues