glama-status-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to glama-status-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA custom MCP server exposing database, ticketing, and external-API tools to both Claude Desktop and a self-built autonomous agent powered by Groq's free-tier LLaMA 3.3.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA unified MCP server that lets Claude query any SQLite database and build live Streamlit dashboards — all from a single conversation.101-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePersonal habit tracking MCP server for a 90-day mission, tracking 6 non-negotiable habits with Supabase backend, exposes tools for logging and viewing progress.4-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for querying AI usage metrics (exact tokens, cost, latency, errors, productivity) from a local SQLite database, enabling charts and analysis in Claude Code and Cursor.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFederated MCP server that joins relational metadata (MySQL) with timeseries values (InfluxDB) behind a single, LLM-friendly entity layer.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCPGate aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single unified endpoint, enabling centralized tool management with granular filtering, automatic namespacing, and observability. Features a real-time web dashboard and optional PostgreSQL-backed audit trails for monitoring and controlling AI tool access across local and remote deployments.6 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Some overlap exists between dedicated report tools (glama_daily_report, glama_scores_summary) and the glama_status tool which has its own 'report' and 'list' operations. Descriptions try to clarify, but an agent might struggle to choose the correct tool for a given task.
All tools follow a consistent 'glama_<descriptive_name>' pattern in snake_case, with clear verb_noun or descriptive names. There is no mixing of conventions or confusing styles.
With 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for monitoring and analyzing Glama scores. Each tool has a distinct purpose, and the count feels neither too few nor too many.
The set covers analysis, reporting, summary, detailed queries, and rich cards. Missing a direct submission tool is acceptable as it's outside the server's scope. Minor gaps like lacking a bulk update feature are not critical.