Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to glama-status-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A custom MCP server exposing database, ticketing, and external-API tools to both Claude Desktop and a self-built autonomous agent powered by Groq's free-tier LLaMA 3.3.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for querying AI usage metrics (exact tokens, cost, latency, errors, productivity) from a local SQLite database, enabling charts and analysis in Claude Code and Cursor.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Federated MCP server that joins relational metadata (MySQL) with timeseries values (InfluxDB) behind a single, LLM-friendly entity layer.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCPGate aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single unified endpoint, enabling centralized tool management with granular filtering, automatic namespacing, and observability. Features a real-time web dashboard and optional PostgreSQL-backed audit trails for monitoring and controlling AI tool access across local and remote deployments.
      6 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Some overlap exists between dedicated report tools (glama_daily_report, glama_scores_summary) and the glama_status tool which has its own 'report' and 'list' operations. Descriptions try to clarify, but an agent might struggle to choose the correct tool for a given task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'glama_<descriptive_name>' pattern in snake_case, with clear verb_noun or descriptive names. There is no mixing of conventions or confusing styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for monitoring and analyzing Glama scores. Each tool has a distinct purpose, and the count feels neither too few nor too many.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers analysis, reporting, summary, detailed queries, and rich cards. Missing a direct submission tool is acceptable as it's outside the server's scope. Minor gaps like lacking a bulk update feature are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues