Search SS6 Changelog

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool 'searches' the changelog but does not explain matching behavior, result format, or limitations. This leaves important operational details unspecified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the action ('Search the SS6 changelog') followed by usage context. Every word earns its place with no unnecessary filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter search tool, the description covers what and when, and the schema handles parameter documentation. However, since there is no output schema, the description does not mention what results contain or how maxResults affects the output, leaving minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides descriptions for both 'query' and 'maxResults,' covering 100% of parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description reinforces the purpose of the query but does not add new syntax or format details beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Search the SS6 changelog for specific terms,' clearly stating the verb, resource, and scope. It also distinguishes itself from siblings by referencing 'the themed documentation sections,' showing this tool is for targeted changelog lookups.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this when you need to find information about a specific class, method, or feature that may not be in the themed documentation sections,' giving clear usage context. However, it does not name alternative tools or state when not to use it, so it falls slightly short of full guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.