mcp-server-example
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-example
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and query enterprise knowledge documents and business metrics through standardized MCP tools, supporting retrieval, structured sales/order analysis, anomaly scanning, and data lineage lookups.12-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, read, and traverse documentation bundles in Open Knowledge Format via MCP tools.233 npm72MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely search and list internal company documents via MCP tools, so they can answer employee questions based on current internal documentation.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query an organization's device posture, compliance, policies, and software/CVE status through a remote, read-only, OAuth-secured MCP endpoint.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) access to technical documentation through MCP, enabling LLMs to search and retrieve relevant documentation on-demand.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables to build and query a knowledge base with retrieval-augmented generation, supporting document ingestion, hybrid search, and live data integration from external APIs via MCP tools.2-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: listing devices, retrieving a device detail, and searching SDK methods. No two tools overlap in purpose or output, so an agent can easily select the right one.
All tool names follow a clear lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_devices, get_device, search_sdk. The convention is perfectly consistent across the set.
Three tools is on the smaller side, but the server appears focused on read-only device catalog and SDK lookup. The count is reasonable for a narrow purpose, though it might feel slightly thin if the server expected broader functionality.
For the implied read-only catalog use case, the coverage is adequate: list and get cover device data, and search covers SDK exploration. Missing create/update/delete operations are acceptable if the server is intentionally read-only, but a get_sdk_method or list_sdk_methods would round out the SDK side.