Skip to main content
Glama
sandcastlelabs

collimer-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to collimer-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to scan any website for AI search visibility, producing AEO, GEO, agent readiness, and mention-readiness scores along with AI identity and business profile insights. Paid tools extend this to competitive comparisons, detailed audits, and generated fixes.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Check whether a website is visible to AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews). Returns a 0-100 readiness score, a grade, and a specific fix for each gap. Dependency-free, no API keys.
      2
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Evaluates any website's AI visibility with 15 checks across crawlability, structure, content, and connectivity, and provides actionable fixes.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to scan brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Perplexity, analyze website GEO readiness, compare competitors, and get actionable recommendations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Runs AI visibility (GEO/AEO) audits on websites, checking AI crawler access, schema markup, llms.txt, and content signals, with optional full PDF report.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of the agent confusing it with another. Its purpose (run a brand AI-visibility scan and return a score) is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single name collimer_scan uses a clean snake_case vendor_noun/verb pattern with no competing conventions. Nothing in the set conflicts with it.

    Tool Count3/5

    A one-tool surface is on the thin side even for a focused scan service, since follow-on actions like re-scanning, comparing deltas, or fetching the full report are alluded to in the description but not exposed. It is defensible as a minimal wrapper, but borderline.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers the core scan action, but the description explicitly defers the ranked fix plan and the verification re-scan to a web account, and there is no way to list past scans or retrieve the report programmatically. That leaves notable gaps around the re-scan/delta workflow the description itself recommends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues