Skip to main content
Glama

test_reddit_mcp_server

Verify Reddit MCP Server connectivity and functionality to ensure proper integration with Reddit's API for content management and analysis.

Instructions

Test the Reddit MCP Server

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The execution handler for the 'test_reddit_mcp_server' tool. It returns a static text message confirming that the Reddit MCP Server is operational.
    case "test_reddit_mcp_server":
      return {
        content: [
          {
            type: "text",
            text: "Hello, world! The Reddit MCP Server is working correctly.",
          },
        ],
      };
  • src/index.ts:89-98 (registration)
    The tool registration in the ListTools response, including name, description, and empty input schema (no parameters required).
    {
      name: "test_reddit_mcp_server",
      description: "Test the Reddit MCP Server",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          // No input parameters, this will just return a test message
        },
      },
    },
  • The input schema definition for the tool, which is an empty object indicating no input parameters are needed.
    inputSchema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        // No input parameters, this will just return a test message
      },
    },
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure but offers none. 'Test' could imply anything from diagnostic checks to validation operations, but there's no indication of what the tool actually does, what side effects it might have, or what the expected outcome is. This leaves the agent completely in the dark about behavioral characteristics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at just 5 words, but this brevity comes at the cost of meaningful information. While front-loaded, it's under-specified rather than efficiently informative. The single sentence structure is simple but fails to convey necessary tool semantics.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and a vague purpose, the description is completely inadequate. It doesn't explain what 'testing' means, what gets tested, what the expected output format might be, or how this differs from the many sibling tools. Given the complexity implied by having 15 specialized sibling tools, this description provides insufficient context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description doesn't mention parameters, which is appropriate given the empty input schema. This meets the baseline expectation for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Test the Reddit MCP Server' is a tautology that restates the tool name with minimal elaboration. It doesn't specify what action 'test' entails or what resources are involved, making it vague about the actual purpose. While it mentions the server context, it fails to distinguish this tool from its many siblings that perform specific Reddit operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the 15 sibling tools listed. There's no mention of prerequisites, appropriate contexts, or alternatives, leaving the agent with no usage direction. This is particularly problematic given the many specialized sibling tools available.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/samy-clivolt/reddit-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server