delete_webhook
Remove a webhook endpoint by specifying its ID to stop receiving event notifications.
Instructions
Delete a webhook endpoint.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| webhook_id | Yes |
Remove a webhook endpoint by specifying its ID to stop receiving event notifications.
Delete a webhook endpoint.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| webhook_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Delete' which implies destructiveness, but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, auth requirements, or impact on associated resources.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that directly communicates the core action. However, it is somewhat under-specified for a tool that could benefit from additional context, making it not fully sufficient as a standalone description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the one-sentence description is insufficient. It fails to explain when to use the tool, what happens on deletion, or any error conditions. For a destructive operation, more context is needed for an AI agent to select and invoke it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the webhook_id parameter beyond its name. The parameter name is self-explanatory, but the description does not compensate for the lack of schema-level explanation, leaving the agent without additional context about format or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (webhook endpoint). It directly differentiates from sibling tools like create_webhook and list_webhooks by indicating the destructive operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or consequences. The description merely states the function without any contextual direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/samuelar2/sentfromai-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server