Skip to main content
Glama
samrathp29
by samrathp29

Related Servers

Alternatives to covidence-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets Claude Code drive your own Chrome browser with human-like clicks, drags, and typing. It uses your real sessions and logins, and pauses for your confirmation on anything irreversible.
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a direct bridge between Claude and an authenticated Chrome session, enabling fetch requests with session cookies and JavaScript execution within live web pages.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives Claude control of a real, headed Chromium browser via Playwright, enabling web navigation, clicking, typing, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation.
      8
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to navigate, screenshot, read console/network, and crawl links in HTML documentation via a co-located headless Chromium and VSCode webview pane.
      11 npm
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Tool boundaries are muddled because covidence_login duplicates the login action in covidence_nav, and covidence_screen returns a full prompt that covers the same reading/voting instructions available via covidence_nav. The remaining tools are distinct, but these overlapping pairs make selection ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The consistent covidence_ prefix and snake_case help, but the forms are mixed: login and screen are bare verbs, nav is an abbreviation, while set_criteria, log_vote, and get_session_log follow a verb_noun pattern. This is readable but not a uniform naming convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With six tools, the server is well-scoped for its niche purpose of guiding Covidence screening sessions. The count is neither bloated nor too thin, and each tool contributes to the core workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The core screening loop—login, set criteria, screen, log votes, and view the session log—is covered, with nav supplying supporting instructions for Chrome-driven actions. Minor gaps like no explicit criteria retrieval or session-end tool are workable but prevent a perfect score.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues