Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-data-extractor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that parses code, documents, data, and config files into structured database snapshots for targeted AI retrieval, enabling code analysis and project understanding via LLM interactions.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A basic TypeScript implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed as a starting point for MCP development. Provides a minimal foundation for building custom MCP servers with stdio configuration for local integration with VS Code and GitHub Copilot.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for automated refactoring of Java and TypeScript/JavaScript codebases.
      16
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that builds and queries a config-aware code graph with support for conditional compilation (#ifdef) filtering, enabling context-aware code analysis across different build configurations.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server based on Model Context Protocol that parses Swagger/OpenAPI documents and generates TypeScript types and API client code for different frameworks (Axios, Fetch, React Query).
      12
      11 npm
      16
      ISC

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target clearly distinct extraction types: structured data (e.g. i18n translations) versus SVG components. An agent can easily choose between them based on the file/content type, with no meaningful overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same verb_noun pattern: extract_data and extract_svg. The naming is simple, predictable, and directly reflects the output type.

    Tool Count4/5

    At two tools, the server is slightly below the typical well-scoped range, but the count is reasonable for a narrowly focused extractor utility. Each tool covers a distinct extraction workflow and earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers its stated domain reasonably well: data extraction and SVG extraction are both implemented with source-replacement behavior. It is a small surface, but there are no obvious dead ends within the apparent scope of a specialized extractor.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues