Skip to main content
Glama
samihalawa

SMTP MCP Server

by samihalawa
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SMTP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Sendmail Server

      maxyychen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables sending emails via SMTP with support for HTML content, attachments, bulk sending, and template-based emails. Features session management and full MCP Streamable HTTP transport compliance.
      -

    • Email Sender MCP Server

      wyccywwyc
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables sending emails through SMTP with support for multiple recipients, attachments, CC/BCC, and both plain text and HTML formats. Includes preset configurations for common email providers like Gmail, QQ, Outlook, and 163.
      5
      -

    • Postmark MCP Server

      Lupiita4
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables sending and managing emails via Postmark, including email delivery with templates, template listing, and delivery statistics.
      MIT

    • Email MCP Server

      fahadBSTech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables sending emails through SMTP using nodemailer, allowing AI assistants to send plain text and HTML emails with configurable SMTP credentials.
      28 npm
      2
      ISC

    • XEM Email MCP Server

      mailxem
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the XEM Email API to send emails, manage campaigns, and organize contact lists. It supports features like HTML content, scheduling, template management, and bulk contact imports from CSV files.
      7
      11 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: account listing, folder listing, searching, modifying, sending, and responding. There is no overlap; even email_send and email_respond are clearly separated by new vs. reply/forward.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent resource_action pattern (e.g., accounts_list, emails_find). However, there is minor inconsistency in singular vs. plural usage (accounts_list vs. email_send) and action placement, but it remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for email operations. Each tool earns its place, covering account context, folder navigation, search, state changes, and message creation without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the core email workflow: discover accounts and folders, find messages, modify their state, send new emails, and reply/forward. No essential operation is missing; even email deletion can be handled via moving to trash.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources