MCP-AnkiConnect
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP-AnkiConnect
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Anki flashcard decks, allowing users to create, manage, and update flashcards through natural language conversations.942MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server connects Claude with Anki, allowing users to create flashcards conversationally and automatically deduplicates, classifies, and uploads them without manual copying and pasting. It runs locally with Ollama for embeddings and classification, ensuring privacy.13-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude Code to create, manage, and search Anki flashcards directly from the terminal. It supports batch card creation, deck statistics retrieval, and synchronization with AnkiWeb for cross-platform review.8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges Claude AI with Anki flashcard app, allowing users to create and manage flashcards using natural language commands.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to Anki for card review and creation, featuring automatic date-based organization of new cards.45 npm1MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables large language models like Claude to automatically generate flashcards and sync them with Anki decks via a Dockerized MCP server using the AnkiConnect add-on.2-
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct functionality: adding notes, moving decks, fetching reviews, inspecting cards, searching, storing media, etc. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tools.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_note, search_notes). One tool (num_cards_due_today) uses 'num' as a prefix instead of a verb, and list_decks_and_notes uses 'and', but overall the pattern is consistent.
14 tools is well-scoped for an Anki integration, covering adding, editing, searching, reviewing, scheduling, and media management without being excessive or too sparse.
The tools cover core workflows (add, edit, review, search, inspect) but lack deletion operations (no delete_note or delete_card) and deck/note type creation. These gaps limit full lifecycle management.