A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceA Go MCP server for inspecting and safely operating Audiobookshelf libraries.
1
MIT
Goodreads MCP
by sameerbajaj
Related Servers
Alternatives to Goodreads MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Goodreads that enables LLMs to search for books, retrieve detailed book info with ratings and reviews, and explore recommendations, series, and author bibliographies using public data sources without requiring authentication.125MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Google Books API, enabling volume details, ISBN lookup, and bookshelf access via natural language queries.411 npm1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceGo MCP server for AnkiWeb spaced-repetition flashcard creation, deck inspection, and sync37Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server in Go to search and download books, papers, comics and more from Library Genesis — three focused tools, one static binary, no account required.424MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server for searching and discovering books using Anna's Archive and Goodreads datasets, enabling full-text search, ISBN/md5 lookup, similarity matching, and optional download URL retrieval.12 npm4MIT
TDQS
C2.9/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation2/5
Most tools target distinct Goodreads resources or actions, but sync and workflow_archive are near-duplicates: both fetch API resources into a local SQLite database with incremental/full resync. enrich also overlaps somewhat with book_get, so an agent cannot reliably distinguish the intended choice from descriptions alone.
Naming Consistency2/5
Tool names mix noun_verb (author_get, book_get, shelf_rate), verb_noun (workflow_archive), single-word commands (context, sync, sql), a hyphenated namespace (goodreads-search_books), and an internal hyphen (review_get-shelf). They are readable but do not follow a predictable convention.
Tool Count3/5
At 16 tools, the set is just above the ideal 3–15 range and feels slightly heavy, especially with the duplicate sync/workflow_archive pair and a separate workflow_status tool. The count is not extreme, but the redundancy inflates the surface.
Completeness3/5
Core read, search, shelf-write, and local sync/SQL operations are present, but there are notable gaps: no standalone review retrieval/write, no author search, and no current-user/profile tool. The sync and workflow_archive descriptions also reference a 'search' command that is not exposed as a tool, leaving a dead end.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues