openmep
Related Servers
Alternatives to openmep
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to load, simulate, inspect, and edit EPANET hydraulic/water-quality models locally via stdio.33MIT

security-orchestraofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides deterministic, standards-based calculations for data center critical power infrastructure. Enables site selection, generator sizing, UPS sizing, NFPA 110 compliance, and more via 50+ AI agents and 8 compound chains.-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceFloor plans, elevations and sections for agents. Draw a room in real millimetres, place doors, windows and tables, validate with typed errors, render deterministic SVG. Free key, no approval.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceConverts structured system dynamics specifications into Vensim .mdl files with layout, SVG preview, static audit, and native Vensim integration. It can be used as an MCP server or from the command line.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive a live AutoCAD session over stdio with transactional, serialized writes: inspecting and saving documents, managing layers, creating and editing line/circle/arc/polyline/rectangle/text entities, querying selections, setting checkpoints, and exporting DXF. Every request is validated against strict schemas with document revision checks and save-reopen geometry readback, and a headless backend is available when no AutoCAD instance is running.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to build, validate, calibrate, and export versioned scientific models with mandatory units, dimensional and numerical checks, and uncertainty analysis over stdio. Models can be simulated and exported to portable formats such as SBML, CellML, and Modelica.158 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have related but distinguishable scopes: size_duct handles one run (with optional grading), while size_duct_network sizes a whole connected system. There is mild overlap since both can grade existing sections, but the single-run vs. network boundary is clear enough for correct selection.
Both names use a consistent snake_case noun_verb pattern (size_duct, size_duct_network), with the network variant being a clean, predictable extension. No mixing of conventions.
Two tools is thin for a duct-design server; the single-run case is arguably a degenerate case of the network tool, so it borders on a minimal surface. The network tool is substantial, but the overall set feels sparse.
Coverage of the core duct-sizing workflow (single run plus full multi-system network with grading and findings) is solid for a focused calc tool. Minor gaps exist, e.g. no standalone grading without sizing or explicit design-parameter/friction-rate configuration, but no major dead ends.