openmep
Related Servers
Alternatives to openmep
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to load, simulate, inspect, and edit EPANET hydraulic/water-quality models locally via stdio.33MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes five deterministic tools over stdio so LLM agents can evaluate all seven kill methods, plan complete well kills and CWI stripping/snubbing operations, and create or step live simulator sessions without hallucinating safety-critical pressure math. Returns kill mud weight, MAASP, stage-by-stage procedures, rig gauges, kill sheets, and graded debriefs.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to draft, read, validate, diff, and take off CAD drawings through a single typed contract served by either a live COM session or a headless ezdxf engine. Ships 247 tools covering P&ID, mechanical, and architectural drafting, with ISO GD&T and dimension-tolerance validation plus spec-to-drawing and takeoff-to-workbook workflows.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive AutoCAD automation through one typed contract over two engines — live COM on Windows or headless ezdxf anywhere — to draft, edit and read drawings, including mechanical parts and sheets, architectural plans with measured room areas, and P&ID diagrams. It also critiques existing drawings, checks scales and topology, and produces takeoff workbooks.MIT

security-orchestraofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides deterministic, standards-based calculations for data center critical power infrastructure. Enables site selection, generator sizing, UPS sizing, NFPA 110 compliance, and more via 50+ AI agents and 8 compound chains.-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create, edit, validate, and read back production-grade CAD drawings — including P&ID sheets, mechanical parts and assemblies, and architectural floor plans with measured areas and schedules — through a single typed tool contract that runs either live via COM on Windows or headlessly via ezdxf anywhere. It also supports standards-aware dimensioning, ISO GD&T and tolerance checks, takeoff workbooks, and drawing understanding, diffing, and critique.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The tools operate at different scopes: size_duct handles a single duct run, while size_duct_network sizes an entire network with multiple segments. The names are similar but the descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes, making confusion unlikely for an agent.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (size_duct, size_duct_network). The only minor issue is that the noun part is very similar, but the naming convention itself is consistent.
With only 2 tools, the server is quite thin for a duct sizing domain. While each tool is well-scoped, the limited count may force agents to rely on external knowledge for common tasks like equipment selection or duct material properties.
The surface covers core duct sizing operations but lacks obvious complementary tools such as equipment selection, pressure loss calculations for fittings beyond equivalent length, or output formatting. Notably, there is no tool to retrieve or list existing duct networks, which could be a gap for iterative design workflows.