mcp-tournament
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-tournament
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables benchmarking of local LLM models (performance and quality) and sharing results to a public leaderboard via MCP tools.14 npm8Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to benchmark AI models across English, Urdu, and Roman Urdu by running question sets, grading answers, measuring confidently wrong and hedged responses, and producing reports, comparisons, and CSV exports through an MCP client or CLI.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables provider-agnostic LLM discovery, capability testing, stability screening, and AIPerf benchmarking through MCP, with persistent SQLite history.41 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to score retrieval quality with recall, precision, nDCG, hit rate and MRR, compare 2-3 configurations with seeded paired-bootstrap confidence intervals, audit agent tool calls against expected traces, and detect prompt regressions against golden sets. It also generates Markdown, JSON or JUnit reports with pass/fail gates, all deterministically and offline without paid API keys.6308 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables running deterministic multi-model prompt regression and golden dataset benchmark suites, exposing structured results and telemetry through the Model Context Protocol for integration with MCP-compliant clients.8-

Patronus MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables running LLM evaluations, experiments, and custom evaluators through a standardized MCP interface.16Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct roles (quick_test vs evaluate by cost/scale, leaderboard vs get_run by aggregate vs single). However, tournament_list_benches and tournament_options overlap on bench/scenario discovery, and plan_run vs evaluate require reading to distinguish preview from execution.
Names follow a consistent tournament_ prefix with snake_case. Most use verb_noun (list_benches, plan_run, get_run, create_bench), but tournament_options and tournament_leaderboard are noun-only, a minor deviation from the pattern.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a tournament/evaluation server. Each tool earns its place: discovery, planning, cheap vs full execution, results reading, and bench creation are all distinct responsibilities.
The evaluation lifecycle is well covered: discover, plan, execute (cheap and full), read results, and create custom benches, with paid-call safeguards. Minor gaps exist around managing saved artifacts (update/delete benches or runs) and cancelling long-running evaluations.