Skip to main content
Glama
samabenie1

Skylight MCP Server

by samabenie1

update_chore

Update an existing chore's details, status, due date, or assignment. Use applyTo to specify whether changes affect all occurrences or future ones for recurring chores.

Instructions

Update an existing chore in Skylight.

Use this when:

  • Marking a chore as complete: "Mark 'dishes' as done"

  • Changing chore assignment: "Reassign the trash to Dad"

  • Updating chore details: "Change the time for the homework chore"

  • Shifting which day(s) a recurring chore falls on: "Move trash day to Wednesday"

Parameters:

  • choreId (required): ID of the chore (from get_chores)

  • summary: New description for the chore

  • status: "completed" to mark done, "pending" to mark incomplete

  • date: New due date. IMPORTANT: for a recurring chore, changing date alone does NOT shift which day(s) it recurs on — the API keeps generating occurrences on the old RRULE weekday regardless of the new date. To actually move a recurring chore's day, also pass recurrencePattern with a matching RRULE (e.g. date="2026-08-26" + recurrencePattern="RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=WE" to move it to Wednesdays), and pass applyTo.

  • recurrencePattern: New recurrence rule for a recurring chore ('daily', 'weekly', 'weekdays', or a raw RRULE string like 'RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=WE'). Use this to actually change a recurring chore's day(s) — date alone won't do it.

  • applyTo: Required for any change to a recurring chore, or the API silently ignores the whole update (200 response, nothing actually changes, no error). Not needed for one-off chores.

    • "all": apply to every occurrence of the series

    • "future": apply to this occurrence and every later one, past occurrences untouched

  • time: New due time

  • assignee: New family member assignment. There is no way to unassign a chore on this account (up_for_grabs is rejected by the API) — assignee can only be reassigned to another family member, never cleared.

Returns: The updated chore details. If any requested field didn't actually change (most commonly: a recurring chore updated without applyTo), this returns an error instead of a false "Updated" success, listing exactly which fields didn't take.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateNoNew due date (YYYY-MM-DD or 'today', 'tomorrow')
timeNoNew due time (e.g., '10:00 AM', or null to clear)
statusNo'completed' to mark done, 'pending' to mark incomplete
applyToNoRequired for any update to a recurring chore, or the change is silently ignored. 'all' = whole series, 'future' = this occurrence onward.
choreIdYesID of the chore to update
summaryNoNew chore description
assigneeNoNew family member to reassign to. Unassigning is not supported.
rewardPointsNoNew reward points (or null to clear)
recurrencePatternNoNew recurrence rule to actually shift a recurring chore's day(s): 'daily', 'weekly', 'weekdays', or an RRULE string (e.g. 'RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=WE'). Changing date alone does not move the recurrence day.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully carries the transparency burden. It reveals critical behaviors: that changing date alone does not shift recurrence, that missing applyTo causes silent 200 responses with no change, and that unassigning is not supported. These details prevent user confusion.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is thorough but slightly repetitive, repeating warnings about applyTo and recurrencePattern multiple times. However, each repetition reinforces critical constraints, and overall the structure is logical and easy to follow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite lacking an output schema, the description explains what the return value is and covers error scenarios (e.g., fields not changing). It also addresses edge cases for recurring chores, making the tool's behavior fully predictable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover 100% of parameters, but the description adds extra nuance beyond the schema, such as explaining the relationship between date and recurrencePattern and clarifying that assignee cannot be cleared. This adds value without being redundant.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function ('Update an existing chore in Skylight') and provides concrete examples of its use cases, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_chore and delete_chore.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly explains when to use the tool (marking complete, reassigning, etc.) and includes important caveats about recurring chores, such as needing applyTo and recurrencePattern. This goes beyond basic usage to guide correct invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/samabenie1/skylight-mcp-fork'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server