Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to wraft-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for MDMA (Markdown Document with Mounted Applications) — interactive Markdown with forms, approval gates, tables, and more. Exposes the MDMA spec, authoring prompts, package metadata, and live docs to AI assistants so agents can author and integrate MDMA correctly.
      7
      48 npm
      67
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Experimental MCP server for the wflow.com public API, enabling natural language operations on documents, registers, users, roles, and teams across one or many organizations.
      26
      6 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflow tools that runs on your infrastructure with Ed25519 signing, enabling autonomous agents to discover and invoke tools securely.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that dynamically exposes each enabled ComfyUI workflow as a tool with JSON Schema, supports job submission with wait and idempotency, file uploads, and resource metadata, with both stdio and authenticated Streamable HTTP transports.
      3
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions (documents, templates, flows, content types), with clear verb-prefixed names. The main potential confusion is between create_document_from_template and create_document, and between get_flow and list_flow_states, but the descriptions clarify their respective purposes well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_, list_, create_, update_, build_, transition_. The only outlier is 'whoami', a common utility convention, so it doesn't disrupt overall readability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the server sits at the upper end of the ideal range but every tool serves a distinct necessary function for document management, template authoring, and approval flows. No redundant or superfluous tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    Core document lifecycle is covered: create (two ways), read, update, build PDF, and transition states. Missing delete operations for documents/templates and an update for data templates are minor gaps that agents can work around, but they don't prevent primary workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues