Skip to main content
Glama
salmansrabon

codex-mcp

by salmansrabon
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gpt-control

      wolfiesch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to request, track, and verify independent cross-model reviews with structured findings, attachment hashes, and provenance receipts via Chrome Bridge, Codex, or Responses transports.
      MIT

    • Loopbreaker

      rordi-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides tools for agents to manage a local review graph, tracking acceptance behaviors, evidence, review passes, and human waivers to decouple review convergence from shipping readiness.
      3
      MIT

    • agent-review

      yibei-wz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first, auditable code review MCP server that freezes Git changes, creates immutable ReviewBundles, provides role-isolated contexts for correctness, security, architecture, and test reviewers, validates structured findings, and generates deterministic JSON/Markdown reports.
      3 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • verdict

      Dgotlieb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides structured, sandboxed test and lint feedback for coding agents, returning compact typed verdicts with failure fingerprints instead of raw runner output. It enables impact-selected test execution in isolated containers, distinguishing pre-existing failures from regressions.
      4
      Apache 2.0

    • Counterfactual Immune Forge

      SweetKenneth
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents and security automation to adjudicate proposed defense mutations against a sealed, canonicalized attack scenario, enforcing reproduction, impact-screening, regression, and proven-improvement gates before promoting at most one candidate. Every verdict, rejected candidate, and rejection reason is sealed into a recomputable SHA-256 Merkle evidence root and hash-linked lineage that can be independently verified without trusting the server.
      6
      MIT

    • multi-judge-consensus

      ElonAug7
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI/agent-generated content to be reviewed by a cross-vendor committee of LLMs, returning verdicts, issues, votes, and cost estimates through an MCP review tool for consensus-based hallucination defense before shipping.
      1
      1
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: codex_qualify runs independent reviews, codex_auth_status checks authentication, and codex_capabilities reports reachable evidence and restrictions. No overlap between these three surfaces.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'codex_' prefix and use lowercase underscore-separated names. The verbs are consistent (qualify, status, capabilities), though 'auth_status' and 'capabilities' are noun-like rather than pure verbs, but the overall pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With three tools, the server is compact but not thin—each tool addresses a distinct concern (qualification, auth, capabilities). The scope is narrow and focused, so this count is appropriate and not bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core workflow: verifying auth before reviews, checking what the server can reach, and running a qualification review. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no history or cancellation tools), but they are not essential to the server's stated purpose and agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources