F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that transforms codebases into intelligent, queryable knowledge bases, enabling AI assistants to perform semantic search, explore architecture, and analyze code relationships.
167
-
Repo Therapist
Related Servers
Alternatives to Repo Therapist
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that analyzes Git repository history and provides insights through AI-compatible tools. It supports hotspot detection, contributor analysis, and code churn tracking.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that extracts and links code, tasks, documentation, and git history into a graph, then diagnoses discrepancies and generates reports.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server for local git repositories that provides tools for code search, git history analysis, complexity metrics, test discovery, and dependency management.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that analyzes local or remote GitHub repositories, providing intelligent code context and structure to AI coding assistants.1013MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that extracts complete knowledge from any codebase — architecture, patterns, dependencies, API surface. Combines static analysis with AI-powered deep interpretation.8MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: analyze_repo is for initial analysis, ask_repo for questions, get_history for git history, get_snapshot for authoritative data, repo_summary for high-level summary, risk_report for risk assessment, and why_is_this_weird for explaining file history. No overlap.
Naming Consistency3/5
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (analyze_repo, ask_repo, get_history, get_snapshot), but repo_summary and risk_report are noun_noun, and why_is_this_weird is a full sentence, creating inconsistency.
Tool Count5/5
Seven tools is well-scoped for a repository analysis server, providing essential functionality without being overwhelming or insufficient.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers key aspects: analysis, Q&A, history, snapshot, summary, and risk assessment. Minor gaps like direct file search or comparison are missing but can be partially addressed by ask_repo.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues