Skip to main content
Glama
saivarun1410

insurance-mcp-poc

by saivarun1410

Related Servers

Alternatives to insurance-mcp-poc

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server providing 5 tools for hybrid search, clause retrieval, policy versioning, code lookup, and plan rider override queries over a synthetic medical-policy corpus.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server exposing internal business operations as tools — task management (create, list, update status) and RAG-style semantic search over an internal knowledge base (leave, expense, and onboarding policies) that any MCP-compatible AI agent can call directly for grounded, non-hallucinated answers.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that answers questions over insurance and regulatory documents using retrieval-augmented generation, returning grounded, cited passages via local embeddings and OpenSearch.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for a production-shaped service-business agent, enabling grounded knowledge search, intake collection, and human escalation with deterministic safety boundaries.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of insurance operations: policy document search, application status tracking, and product rule evaluation. There is no overlap in their purposes or outputs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: search_policy_documents, get_application_status, lookup_product_rules. The verbs (search, get, lookup) are semantically appropriate and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped to a specific insurance POC use case. Each tool addresses a core need without redundancy, making the count appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The main workflows of querying policy content, checking application status, and verifying product rules are covered. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tools for creating/updating applications), but for a POC the surface is reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues