Skip to main content
Glama
saiprashanths

Code Analysis MCP Server

read_file

Read and display file contents from a repository to analyze code structure and understand system architecture during development.

Instructions

Read and display the contents of a file from the repository.

Args:
    file_path: Path to the file relative to repository root

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
file_pathYes

Implementation Reference

  • The primary handler for the 'read_file' MCP tool. Registered with @mcp.tool(), performs prerequisite checks, gitignore filtering, invokes the FileReader helper, and returns formatted file content or error message.
    @mcp.tool()
    async def read_file(file_path: str) -> str:
        """Read and display the contents of a file from the repository.
        
        Args:
            file_path: Path to the file relative to repository root
        """
        if not mcp.repo_path or not mcp.file_reader or not mcp.analyzer:
            return "No code repository has been initialized yet. Please use initialize_repository first."
    
        try:
            # Check if file should be ignored based on gitignore patterns
            if mcp.analyzer.should_ignore(file_path):
                return f"File {file_path} is ignored based on .gitignore patterns"
    
            result = mcp.file_reader.read_file(file_path)
            
            if result.get("isError", False):
                return result["content"][0]["text"]
            
            return result["content"][0]["text"]
            
        except Exception as e:
            return f"Error reading file: {str(e)}"
  • The core helper method in the FileReader class that implements file reading logic: path safety checks, size/line limits, language detection, content formatting, and error handling for the MCP tool.
    def read_file(self, file_path: str) -> Dict[str, Union[List[Dict[str, str]], bool]]:
        """Read and format file contents for LLM consumption."""
        try:
            full_path = self.repo_path / file_path
            
            # Check if path is safe
            if not full_path.resolve().is_relative_to(self.repo_path.resolve()):
                return {
                    "content": [{
                        "type": "text",
                        "text": f"Error: Attempted to access file outside repository: {file_path}"
                    }],
                    "isError": True
                }
            
            # Check if file exists
            if not full_path.exists():
                return {
                    "content": [{
                        "type": "text",
                        "text": f"File {file_path} not found"
                    }],
                    "isError": True
                }
            
            # Check if it's a symbolic link
            if full_path.is_symlink():
                return {
                    "content": [{
                        "type": "text",
                        "text": f"Error: Symbolic links are not supported: {file_path}"
                    }],
                    "isError": True
                }
            
            # Get file stats
            stats = full_path.stat()
            
            # Check file size
            if stats.st_size > self.MAX_SIZE:
                return {
                    "content": [{
                        "type": "text",
                        "text": f"File {file_path} is too large ({stats.st_size} bytes). "
                             f"Maximum size is {self.MAX_SIZE} bytes."
                    }],
                    "isError": True
                }
            
            # Read file content with line limit
            lines = []
            line_count = 0
            truncated = False
            
            with open(full_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
                for line in f:
                    line_count += 1
                    if line_count <= self.MAX_LINES:
                        lines.append(line.rstrip('\n'))
                    else:
                        truncated = True
                        break
            
            content = '\n'.join(lines)
            if truncated:
                content += f"\n\n[File truncated after {self.MAX_LINES} lines]"
            
            # Detect language
            language = self._detect_language(file_path)
            
            return {
                "content": [{
                    "type": "text",
                    "text": f"File: {file_path}\n"
                           f"Language: {language}\n"
                           f"Size: {stats.st_size} bytes\n"
                           f"Total lines: {line_count}\n\n"
                           f"{content}"
                }]
            }
            
        except UnicodeDecodeError:
            return {
                "content": [{
                    "type": "text",
                    "text": f"Error: File {file_path} appears to be a binary file"
                }],
                "isError": True
            }
        except Exception as error:
            return {
                "content": [{
                    "type": "text",
                    "text": f"Error reading file: {str(error)}"
                }],
                "isError": True
            }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states the tool reads and displays file contents, implying a read-only operation, but lacks details on permissions, error handling (e.g., for missing files), output format (e.g., text vs. raw bytes), or limitations (e.g., file size constraints). This leaves significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves beyond its basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized with two sentences: a clear purpose statement and parameter explanation. It's front-loaded with the core function, and the parameter note adds necessary detail without redundancy. However, the formatting with 'Args:' could be slightly more integrated for optimal flow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimally complete but has gaps. It covers the basic purpose and parameter semantics but lacks usage guidelines, behavioral details, and output information, making it adequate for simple tasks but insufficient for robust agent operation in varied scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful context for the single parameter 'file_path' by specifying it's 'relative to repository root', which clarifies usage beyond the schema's basic type definition. With 0% schema description coverage and only one parameter, this compensates adequately, though it doesn't detail format constraints (e.g., path syntax).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Read and display the contents') and resource ('a file from the repository'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_repo_info (repository metadata) and get_repo_structure (directory listing). It precisely communicates what the tool does without being vague or tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While it implies usage for reading file contents, it doesn't specify prerequisites (e.g., repository must be initialized), exclusions (e.g., binary files), or comparisons to sibling tools like get_repo_structure for browsing directories. This leaves the agent without contextual decision-making help.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/saiprashanths/code-analysis-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server