Skip to main content
Glama
sagelabs-dev

Paperless-NGX MCP Server

by sagelabs-dev

Related Servers

Alternatives to Paperless-NGX MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with a paperless-ngx document management system through MCP tools, allowing document search, retrieval, upload, and metadata management via natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching, tagging, uploading, and reading documents in Paperless-NGX, with management of tags, correspondents, document types, and custom fields via MCP tools and resources.
      50
      87 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables managing Paperless-NGX documents, tags, correspondents, and document types via natural language. Supports document searching, downloading, uploading, and bulk editing.
      78 npm
      ISC
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A privacy-first MCP server for Paperless-ngx that lets an LLM agent search, organize, tag, and reference documents without exposing full text unless explicitly requested.
      13
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action, and descriptions clearly delineate overlapping areas (query_documents vs search_passages vs list_documents). The lingering deprecated search_documents alongside three other document-retrieval tools introduces some confusion, and bulk_edit_* tools partially overlap with individual delete_* operations, but boundaries are mostly clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set follows a strong verb_noun convention (list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, bulk_edit_, search_, query_). Minor deviations exist: post_document instead of create_document/upload_document, and process_mail_account vs the mail-rule verbs, but these are readable and few.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 45 tools this surface is heavy. While each does roughly map to a resource/action across documents, tags, correspondents, document types, custom fields, notes, and mail accounts/rules, the sheer number (with deprecated and bulk variants layered on top) exceeds what most agents can select from reliably.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: full CRUD for correspondents, document types, tags, custom fields, and mail rules, plus rich document read/upload/query/notes operations. Minor gaps remain — no singular get_tag and no first-class delete_document (only via bulk_edit_documents) — but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues