Skip to main content
Glama
safurrier

MCP Filesystem Server

by safurrier
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Filesystem Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP-FileSystem

      dgholamian
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants secure, sandboxed filesystem access with tools for reading, writing, searching, and managing files and directories.
      MIT

    • MCP Local File Reader

      sworddut
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI models to safely access and interact with local file systems, enabling reading file contents, listing directories, and retrieving file metadata.
      2 npm
      10
      MIT

    • MCP Filesystem Server

      gabrielmaialva33
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that provides controlled filesystem access within predefined directories, enabling AI models to perform file and directory operations with strict path validation.
      16
      3 npm
      7
      MIT

    • Filesystem MCP Server

      QuantGeekDev
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that extends AI capabilities by providing file system access and management functionalities to Claude or other AI assistants.
      212 npm
      5
      -

    • FS-MCP Server

      boleyn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides intelligent file reading and semantic search capabilities across multiple document formats with security-first access controls.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with minimal overlap. For example, read_file reads entire files while head_file reads first lines, and edit_file makes line-based edits while edit_file_at_line targets specific lines. The find_* tools (duplicate_files, empty_directories, large_files) each target different search criteria, preventing confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern with snake_case throughout. Examples include calculate_directory_size, compare_files, create_directory, and list_directory. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the tool set predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 21 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a filesystem server covering a broad range of operations. It includes core file operations (read, write, move), directory management, search utilities, and specialized tools like duplicate detection. While comprehensive, it might feel heavy but remains well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for filesystem operations, including CRUD (create_directory, write_file, read_file, move_file, delete implied via move/overwrite), search (grep_files, search_files), metadata (get_file_info), and utilities (compare_files, edit_file). There are no obvious gaps, and tools support common workflows like file editing, directory traversal, and content analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources