Scored across 58 tools
Tools are namespaced by domain (files, tags, projects, calendar, journal, admin, resources, hands) and within each domain actions are clearly distinct. For instance, files.search (FTS) vs files.regex_search (regex) are explicitly differentiated with usage guidance, and tags.suggest vs tags.list serve different purposes. No two tools appear to overlap meaningfully.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern with domain prefixes: files.create, files.update, tags.add, tags.remove, projects.list, calendar.events.add, admin.commit_backup, etc. Even multi-word names like files.diff_against_disk and admin.refresh_session_context stick to the same style. No mixing of conventions.
58 tools is well above the 25+ threshold considered too many. While the server covers a broad knowledge-management domain (files, tags, projects, calendar, journal, resources, admin), the sheer volume risks overwhelming agents and makes tool selection harder. Many tools are highly specialized, but the count is excessive for typical usage.
The tool surface is comprehensive for the stated domain: full CRUD for files and tags, search with fallbacks, history/diff/restore, project management, calendar events and entities with conflict detection, journaling lifecycle, resource handling, and admin operations including backups and agent onboarding. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no project update/delete, no profile update), but agents can work around them.