Skip to main content
Glama
Claude File Manager MCP

Claude File Manager MCP

by sadd11

Related Servers

Alternatives to Claude File Manager MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local file reading and writing for your project via Claude Desktop, with tools to read, write, and list files in a specified root path.
      7
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides Claude with complete file system integration including directory management, file operations, Office document creation/editing, and advanced file tree visualization.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Desktop with direct access to your local file system for development tasks, enabling file operations (read, write, edit), directory browsing, command execution, and codebase search within a configured projects directory.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables an LLM agent to search files, list directories, read and write UTF-8 text files, move or delete paths, list terminal processes, and launch a terminal in a chosen folder.
      8
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop or other MCP clients to execute shell commands, read/write files, and list directories on the local machine. Includes basic safety guardrails to block obviously destructive operations.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions and resource types, and descriptions help distinguish listing, searching, and archive operations. Some overlap remains among editing tools (edit_file, multi_edit, replace_in_files) and file-writing tools (write_file, append_file), but the boundaries are reasonably explained.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern such as read_file, create_directory, and restore_path. Minor deviations like file_info (noun-first) and multi_edit (missing an explicit object) are readable and do not seriously undermine consistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 22 tools the surface is on the heavy side, but this is a broad file-manager domain with editing, search, archives, trash, and undo operations. Each tool appears to earn its place rather than being redundant filler.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers a full file-management lifecycle: listing, reading, writing, editing, moving/copying, deleting, restoring from trash, archive creation/extraction, search, and undo. No obvious operational gaps remain for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues