YourMemory
Supports PostgreSQL with pgvector as a high-performance backend for storing and performing vector similarity searches on persistent memory datasets.
Uses SQLite as a zero-configuration local storage engine for managing persistent memory and vector embeddings without external infrastructure.
Persistent memory for AI agents — built on the science of how humans remember.
What Is YourMemory?
Every session, your AI assistant starts from zero. It asks the same questions, forgets your preferences, re-learns your stack. There is no memory between conversations.
YourMemory fixes that with a one-command install that plugs into Claude, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, or any MCP client. It gives your AI a persistent memory layer modelled on human cognition:
Things that matter stick — importance score controls how quickly a memory decays
Outdated facts get replaced — subject-aware deduplication merges or supersedes memories automatically
Related context surfaces together — entity graph links memories that share people, places, or concepts
Old memories fade naturally — Ebbinghaus forgetting curve prunes stale context every 24 hours
Zero infrastructure required. SQLite by default, Postgres for teams.
Related MCP server: YantrikDB MCP
Table of Contents
Benchmarks
Three external datasets, all scripts open source and reproducible. Full methodology in BENCHMARKS.md.
LongMemEval-S — 500 questions, ~53 distractor sessions each
The hardest standard benchmark for long-term memory systems. Each question is backed by ~53 conversation sessions; the model must retrieve the right one(s) from the haystack.
Metric | Score |
Recall@5 (any gold session in top-5) | 89.4% |
Recall-all@5 (all gold sessions in top-5) | 84.8% |
nDCG@5 (ranking quality) | 87.4% |
By question type (Recall@5):
Question Type | Recall@5 | n |
single-session-assistant | 98.2% | 56 |
knowledge-update | 96.2% | 78 |
multi-session | 95.5% | 133 |
single-session-preference | 90.0% | 30 |
temporal-reasoning | 84.2% | 133 |
single-session-user | 72.9% | 70 |
LoCoMo-10 — 1,534 QA pairs across 10 multi-session conversations
Conversations spanning weeks to months. Every system ingests the same session summaries in the same order.
System | Recall@5 | 95% CI |
YourMemory (BM25 + vector + graph + decay) | 59% | 56–61% |
Zep Cloud | 28% | 26–30% |
Supermemory | 31%* | 28–33% |
Mem0 | 18%* | 16–20% |
2× better recall than Zep Cloud across all 10 samples. * Supermemory and Mem0 exhausted free-tier quotas mid-benchmark; scores computed over full 1,534 pairs using 0 for unfinished samples.
HotpotQA — 200 multi-hop questions requiring two facts from different articles
System | BOTH_FOUND@5 |
YourMemory (vector + BM25 + entity graph) | 71.5% |
YourMemory (no entity edges) | 59.5% |
Entity graph edges add +12 pp — they traverse from Fact 1 to Fact 2 even when Fact 2 has low embedding similarity to the query.
Writeup: I built memory decay for AI agents using the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve
Quick Start
Supports Python 3.11–3.14. No Docker, no database setup. All memory stored locally in ~/.yourmemory/.
Before you install — what this does
Behavior | Detail |
Activation | Requires a one-time token. Visit yourmemoryai.xyz, enter your email, verify with a 6-digit code, and copy your token. |
Global rule injection |
|
MCP tool behavior | The |
Telemetry | A UUID (no personal data) is sent on first setup only. Opt out: |
Activation steps:
Visit yourmemoryai.xyz and enter your email
Check your inbox for a 6-digit verification code
Enter the code on the website — your token is shown instantly
Run the three commands below:
pip install yourmemory
yourmemory-register <your-token>
yourmemory-setupMemory Dashboard
Two built-in browser UIs — no extra setup, start automatically with the MCP server.
Memory Browser — http://localhost:3033/ui
A full read/write view of everything stored in memory.
What you see | Details |
Stats bar | Total · Strong ≥50% · Fading 5–50% · Near prune <10% |
Agent tabs | All / User / per-agent views |
Memory cards | Content · strength bar · category · recall count · last accessed |
Filters | Category (fact / strategy / assumption / failure) · Sort by strength, recency, recall |
Pass ?user=<id> to pre-load a specific user: http://localhost:3033/ui?user=sachit
Graph Visualiser — http://localhost:3033/graph
An interactive force-directed map of how memories connect.
http://localhost:3033/graph?memoryId=42&userId=sachit&depth=2Root memory as a larger cyan node; neighbours color-coded by category
Edge thickness = connection strength
Click any node for full content; drag, zoom, reposition freely
Ask Without Calling the API
The only memory system that can answer questions without making any LLM API call.
yourmemory ask "what database does this project use"
# → YourMemory uses DuckDB locally and Postgres in production.
yourmemory ask "what port does the dashboard run on"
# → 3033
yourmemory ask "how do I fix a kubernetes deployment"
# → Not enough memory context to answer without Claude.When memory is strong enough, it answers instantly — zero tokens, zero cloud cost, zero latency. When it isn't, it declines cleanly rather than hallucinating.
Query | Mem0 / Zep / LangMem | YourMemory |
"What port does the server run on?" | Full LLM API call | Instant, $0 |
"What database does this project use?" | Full LLM API call | Instant, $0 |
"How do I fix a k8s deployment?" | Full LLM API call | Declines → Claude |
Privacy | Query sent to cloud | Never leaves your machine |
API Proxy — Guaranteed Memory
MCP tools are called at the AI's discretion. The API proxy removes that uncertainty — it intercepts every LLM call, injects relevant memories automatically, and handles store_memory / update_memory without any model configuration.
Start the YourMemory server (yourmemory), then point your LLM client at localhost:3033:
OpenAI
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key="sk-...",
base_url="http://localhost:3033/proxy/openai"
)
# Memory is injected automatically — no other changes needed
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What database do I use?"}]
)Anthropic
from anthropic import Anthropic
client = Anthropic(
api_key="sk-ant-...",
base_url="http://localhost:3033/proxy/anthropic"
)
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-8",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What database do I use?"}]
)Per-user memory
Pass X-YourMemory-User to isolate memory per person:
client = OpenAI(
api_key="sk-...",
base_url="http://localhost:3033/proxy/openai",
default_headers={"X-YourMemory-User": "sachit"}
)How it works
On every request the proxy:
Recalls relevant memories and injects them into the system prompt — guaranteed, no tool call needed
Adds
store_memoryandupdate_memoryas tools — the model calls them when it learns something newExecutes those tool calls locally and returns the final response transparently
Streaming note: recall injection works for all requests. Tool call interception (store/update) works for non-streaming requests only — streaming passes through and tools execute on the next turn.
MCP Tools
Three tools, called by your AI automatically.
Tool | When your AI calls it | What it does |
| Start of every task | Surfaces memories ranked by similarity × decay strength; spatial boost for path-matched memories |
| After learning something new | Embeds, deduplicates, stores with decay; tags optional file/dir paths |
| When a stored fact is outdated | Re-embeds and replaces; logs old content to audit trail |
# Store with spatial context
store_memory(
"Sachit prefers tabs over spaces in Python",
importance=0.9,
category="fact",
context_paths=["/projects/backend"]
)
# Next session — spatial boost fires when working in that directory
recall_memory("Python formatting", current_path="/projects/backend")
# → {"content": "Sachit prefers tabs over spaces in Python", "strength": 0.87}Memory categories control decay rate
Category | Half-life | Best for |
| ~38 days | Patterns that worked, architectural decisions |
| ~24 days | Preferences, identity, stable knowledge |
| ~19 days | Inferred context, uncertain beliefs |
| ~11 days | Errors, wrong approaches, environment-specific issues |
How It Works
Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve
Memory strength decays exponentially. Importance and recall frequency slow that decay:
effective_λ = base_λ × (1 − importance × 0.8)
strength = clamp(importance × e^(−effective_λ × active_days) × (1 + recall_count × 0.2), 0, 1)
hybrid_score = 0.4 × bm25_norm + 0.6 × cosine_similarityactive_days counts only days the user was active — vacations don't cause memory loss. Memories below strength 0.05 are pruned automatically every 24 hours.
Session wrap-up: recalled memory IDs are tracked per session. When a session goes idle (30 min default), those memories get a recall_count boost. Set YOURMEMORY_SESSION_IDLE to change the window.
Recall throttling: identical (user, query) pairs are cached within a configurable window. Set YOURMEMORY_RECALL_COOLDOWN (seconds, default 0 = off).
Hybrid Retrieval: Vector + BM25 + Entity Graph
Retrieval runs in two rounds:
Round 1 — Hybrid search: cosine similarity + BM25 keyword scoring, returns top-k candidates above threshold.
Round 2 — Graph expansion: BFS traversal from Round 1 seeds surfaces memories that share context but not vocabulary — connected via semantic or entity edges.
recall("Python backend")
Round 1 → [1] Python/MongoDB (sim=0.61)
[2] DuckDB/spaCy (sim=0.19)
Round 2 → [5] Docker/Kubernetes (sim=0.29 — below cut-off, surfaced via shared entity "backend")Chain-aware pruning: a decayed memory is kept alive if any graph neighbour is above the prune threshold. Related memories age together.
Subject-Aware Deduplication
Before storing, YourMemory checks whether the new memory is about the same entity as the nearest existing one:
"Sachit uses DuckDB" vs "YourMemory uses DuckDB"
subject: Sachit subject: YourMemory
→ different entities → stored separately ✓
"YourMemory uses DuckDB" vs "YourMemory stores data in DuckDB"
subject: YourMemory subject: YourMemory
→ same entity → merged ✓Subject comparison embeds the first two tokens of each sentence — no hardcoded word lists, generalises to any language.
Multi-Agent Memory
Multiple agents can share one YourMemory instance — each with isolated private memories and controlled access to shared context.
from src.services.api_keys import register_agent
result = register_agent(
agent_id="coding-agent",
user_id="sachit",
can_read=["shared", "private"],
can_write=["shared", "private"],
)
# → result["api_key"] — ym_xxxx (shown once only)# Agent stores a private failure memory
store_memory(
"Staging uses self-signed cert — skip SSL verify",
importance=0.7, category="failure",
api_key="ym_xxxx", visibility="private"
)
# Recalls shared + its own private memories; other agents see shared only
recall_memory("staging SSL", api_key="ym_xxxx")Stack
Component | Role |
DuckDB | Default vector DB — zero setup, native cosine similarity |
NetworkX | Default graph backend — persists at |
sentence-transformers | Local embeddings ( |
spaCy | Local NLP for deduplication and entity extraction |
APScheduler | Automatic 24h decay and pruning job |
PostgreSQL + pgvector | Optional — for teams or large datasets |
Neo4j | Optional graph backend |
Architecture
Claude / Cline / Cursor / Any MCP client
│
├── recall_memory(query, current_path?, api_key?)
│ └── throttle check → embed → hybrid search (Round 1)
│ → graph BFS expansion (Round 2)
│ → score = sim × strength
│ → spatial boost (+0.08) if current_path matches context_paths
│ → temporal boost (+0.25) if query has time window expression
│ → session tracking → recall_count bump on session end
│
├── store_memory(content, importance, category?, context_paths?, api_key?)
│ └── question? → reject
│ subject-aware dedup → same entity? merge/reinforce : new
│ embed() → INSERT → index_memory() → graph node + edges
│ record_activity(user_id) → active days log
│
└── update_memory(id, new_content, importance)
└── log old content → memory_history (audit trail)
embed(new_content) → UPDATE → refresh graph node
Vector DB (Round 1) Graph DB (Round 2)
DuckDB (default) NetworkX (default)
memories.duckdb graph.pkl
├── embedding FLOAT[768] ├── nodes: memory_id, strength
├── importance FLOAT └── edges: sim × verb_weight ≥ 0.4
├── recall_count INTEGER
├── context_paths JSON Neo4j (opt-in)
├── created_at TIMESTAMP └── bolt://localhost:7687
├── visibility VARCHAR
├── agent_id VARCHAR
user_activity (active days log)
memory_history (supersession audit)Contributing
PRs are welcome. See CONTRIBUTORS.md for contributors who have already improved YourMemory.
Dataset References
LoCoMo — Maharana et al. (2024). LoCoMo: Long Context Multimodal Benchmark for Dialogue. Snap Research.
LongMemEval — Wu et al. (2024). LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory.
HotpotQA — Yang et al. (2018). HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering.
License
Copyright 2026 Sachit Misra — Licensed under CC-BY-NC-4.0.
Free for: personal use, education, academic research, open-source projects. Not permitted: commercial use without a separate written agreement.
Commercial licensing: mishrasachit1@gmail.com
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sachitrafa/cognitive-ai-memory'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server