Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to 54ch10-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to check URLs for scam/phishing risks, get verdicts with confidence and severity, report false positives, and monitor plan usage.
      3
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Wraps the ScanMalware.com API to enable phishing triage, malware scanning, and certificate inspection through natural language, allowing users to submit scans, retrieve results, and analyze threats via MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for IP threat intelligence lookup and enrichment, including single IP lookup, bulk hunting, ASN expansion, and feed status queries.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes urlscan.io as tools for security investigations, with compact results optimized for context windows. Enables pivoting on indicators, searching scans, retrieving screenshots, DOM, and scan results, and submitting URLs.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Thin MCP wrapper around the SQD Portal API for blockchain data queries across multiple networks including EVM, Solana, Bitcoin, Substrate, and Hyperliquid. Provides 25 public tools for discovery, cross-chain queries, and chain-specific operations.
      10
      28
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      53 security & enrichment MCP tools for AI agents. Contract scanning, threat intel, OSINT, crypto data, DNS/WAF recon. Pay-per-call via HTTP 402 + USDC on Base mainnet. No API keys. First call free.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The set includes ten legacy aliases that duplicate primary tools exactly (brief vs url.open, whois vs domain.whois, etc.), so many tools effectively do the same thing. Even though descriptions label the aliases, an agent must choose between redundant names.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Primary tools use a clean resource.action style (url.open, domain.whois, paste.read), but this is mixed with url.open_batch, bare legacy names like brief and dns, and hyphenated normalize-url. The naming is not chaotic but it is inconsistent across the full tool set.

    Tool Count3/5

    21 tools is borderline heavy, and roughly half are legacy duplicates of the primary 11 tools. The unique surface is reasonable, but exposing aliases as separate tools inflates the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core URL risk workflow: normalize, open/batch, fetch, plus domain enrichment (whois/dns/tls) and small utilities. Minor gaps like no explicit domain reputation endpoint or batch result retrieval can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues